I wouldn't say "deaf ears" exactly but there was a a distinct reluctance to admit that certain problems even existed. Time and again I would submit simultaneous comparisons between the Mobius 2 and other cameras like the M1 or the SG9665GC. In one instance I submitted screen shots comparing the M2 and SG9665GC entering a roundabout at night. I had specifically been asked to test with WDR turned OFF because the results with WDR turned ON were so abysmal.
The reply I received was
"We could see M2 got a bit over exposured and the lens flare control is not good enough. But we can also see the sensor ability. Look at the green trees at far. We can see much more."
I tried desperately to explain that the visible trees in the distance are completely irrelevant. We are using the M2 as a DASH CAM here,
not an RC FPV camera. I attempted to explain that as a dash cam the
requirement is to clearly capture the cars on the road in from of you and hopefully the license plates. The M2 was failing miserably at this. As a beta tester being told that the trees in the distance are visible while ignoring the elephant in the room about the otherwise poor performance of the camera was exasperating. This experience more or less played itself out over and over.
Here are two of the examples in question that I'm referring to.
Here you see the M2 example ....., the one where the response was, "
Look at the green trees at far. We can see much more"!
View attachment 34656
Here is the simultaneous "control" example from the SG9665GC submitted for comparison. The make and models of the cars are apparent along with a clear license plate number and identifiable state of registration for the car to my right.
I don't know, maybe "deaf ears" is the correct term after all. Remember, these tests were done two years ago and even with the more recently improved firmware the camera still is not performing as it should (or was promised when announced in 2015 ).
View attachment 34655