Trav-4-fun-009
New Member
I was involved in an incident in which a car, with intent, while traveling at about 30 mph struck the rear of my car. After impact the driver just drove off at high speed. (Note: He intentially the back of my car. This constitutes Hit and Run, period. This type of activity is classified as Vehicular assault, a felony.
We waited for about 90 minutes for the police to arrived to take a police report. While taking the report, they did take the photo of the Car and Lic I provided that hit me. They were not interested in the Dash Cam video. Due to time that had elasped, there was no reason to look for the driver or car. The officer told me to just let my insurance company take care of it. The major reason for their lack of interest was no one was injured.
The reality of this incident indicates two possible courses of action:
1. Criminal proceeding - Not going to happen due to the lack of injuries,
2. Civil suite for damages - not cost effective. That's what I have insc for. Dealing with someone who exhibits this kind of road rage is dangerous.
Now in analyzing the situation, I find a couple of things of note.
One is that as always happens, Mr. Murphy got involved. How you ask? The incident was captured by the dash cam but was split due to the camera capture configuration.
Two, Only the rear camera was able to capture the impact, but with limited effectiveness due it's field of view due and the location of the impact on the Driver's side rear quarter panel.
My take away, is that I was lucky. This nut case could have had a gun. Yes he got away with it and should not be driving.
Had anyone one been injured, the video would have proven who did what and that's what I installed it for.
As always you can't win em all.
We waited for about 90 minutes for the police to arrived to take a police report. While taking the report, they did take the photo of the Car and Lic I provided that hit me. They were not interested in the Dash Cam video. Due to time that had elasped, there was no reason to look for the driver or car. The officer told me to just let my insurance company take care of it. The major reason for their lack of interest was no one was injured.
The reality of this incident indicates two possible courses of action:
1. Criminal proceeding - Not going to happen due to the lack of injuries,
2. Civil suite for damages - not cost effective. That's what I have insc for. Dealing with someone who exhibits this kind of road rage is dangerous.
Now in analyzing the situation, I find a couple of things of note.
One is that as always happens, Mr. Murphy got involved. How you ask? The incident was captured by the dash cam but was split due to the camera capture configuration.
Two, Only the rear camera was able to capture the impact, but with limited effectiveness due it's field of view due and the location of the impact on the Driver's side rear quarter panel.
My take away, is that I was lucky. This nut case could have had a gun. Yes he got away with it and should not be driving.
Had anyone one been injured, the video would have proven who did what and that's what I installed it for.
As always you can't win em all.