DublinsDashcamFootage
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 34
- Location
- Dublin
- Country
- Ireland
- Dash Cam
- mini 0801
Hit and run Ireland
- Thread starter DublinsDashcamFootage
- Start date
GTA Driver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2015
- Messages
- 1,264
- Reaction score
- 602
- Location
- Greater Toronto Area
- Country
- Canada
- Dash Cam
- Iroad 3300CH, G1W-c, Mobius C, A119 v1 & v3, A118-c2
Doesn't look like a slamming of the brakes to me. Looks more like un-attentive driver from the rear.
SawMaster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2015
- Messages
- 9,450
- Reaction score
- 8,315
- Location
- SC
- Country
- United States
- Dash Cam
- Numerous and ever-changing
The stopping was gradual enough and the speeds low. If the driver in the rear isn't paying enough attention to handle this they should not be allowed to drive ever again 
Phil
Phil
OP
OP
DublinsDashcamFootage
Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 74
- Reaction score
- 34
- Location
- Dublin
- Country
- Ireland
- Dash Cam
- mini 0801
Yeah, seems like the other driver didn't even brake at all until impact.
kamkar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 34,284
- Reaction score
- 18,897
- Country
- Denmark
- Dash Cam
- 10 years, many dashcams
And that's why you need a dashcam, cuz that duchebag in the rear will claim something like that and thats not true at all, but anything to get out of blame.
A rear camera would maybe have captured the car behind being operated with 1 or two eyes on the mobil phone,,,,, and that's one reason why i like a little zoom on a rear camera as it will make it easier to tell, and of course a CPL filter to remove some of the sky reflections in the windscreen of the car back there.
So this is a stellar example why a rear camera are good to have,,,,,, but you dont really need it at least not in this case.
Besides here in Denmark you are supposed to try and avoid dogs, cats and other animals you dont even have to brake for, though with a deer or something like that i would still recommend it.
I would have been taking a pic of the collar and have words with the owner of that dog too, cuz it is handled irresponsible too.
And not only are you supposed to look where you are driving, you are also supposed to keep a safe distance, both things the driver behind failed i bet.
A rear camera would maybe have captured the car behind being operated with 1 or two eyes on the mobil phone,,,,, and that's one reason why i like a little zoom on a rear camera as it will make it easier to tell, and of course a CPL filter to remove some of the sky reflections in the windscreen of the car back there.
So this is a stellar example why a rear camera are good to have,,,,,, but you dont really need it at least not in this case.
Besides here in Denmark you are supposed to try and avoid dogs, cats and other animals you dont even have to brake for, though with a deer or something like that i would still recommend it.
I would have been taking a pic of the collar and have words with the owner of that dog too, cuz it is handled irresponsible too.
And not only are you supposed to look where you are driving, you are also supposed to keep a safe distance, both things the driver behind failed i bet.
Last edited:
Gibson99
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,293
- Reaction score
- 8,079
- Location
- Houston, we've had a problem, Texas
- Country
- United States
- Dash Cam
- Yes
rear cam might have captured the plates better than the front, and the driver's face as well so there could be no denying anything.
