Review: Vantrue OnDash R2

DrekiTech

Active Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
276
Reaction score
247
Location
Vancouver, BC
Country
Canada
Dash Cam
A129
Please note: I was supplied this dash cam by Vantrue for review purposes. This dash cam is based on the 4MP OV4689 + Ambarella A7L50. All settings are 1080p30 unless otherwise noted.


Vantrue OnDash R2 Review:

Rating: 4/5


What I Like:
-Good daylight and very good night video
-Great mounting hardware included
-Micro USB cable plugs into windshield mount for ease of installation
-Easy to use UI
-Motion sensitive parking mode
-Solid build quality

What I Don't Like:
-Some video quality is lost in compression artifacts especially in high resolution modes
-Still images render incorrectly in 4:3 instead of 16:9
-Shiny silver makes the camera visible from outside the car

-------
Video Transcript
-------

Overview:
The camera itself very well made. It is matte black with silver highlights and about the size of a G1W. The rear is dominated by a screen and four buttons. The screen is built in such a way that it's easy to wipe off any fingerprints and smudges - far better than the recessed screens of other dash cams I've tested. The user interface is extremely straightforward and probably the best I've used so far because all the buttons make sense and the menus are easy to understand. The cameras build itself is fantastic and my favorite part of this package is the included mounting hardware. I really like how the power cable has an additional USB charging port for a phone or another device. A twist lock sticks the mount firmly to the windshield and the USB cable can plug directly into the mount so it is easier to hide. Overall this mounting hardware feels much stronger than the dash cams that just slip onto the mount and the camera wiggles less while driving as a result.

Video quality, daytime:
During the day time video quality is pretty good. Details are clear and colours are bright. White balance is en point. Everything is sharp and in focus. The Vantrue offers up to 2k resolution, but after comparing footage from the various options I found myself preferring the 1080p mode - and I think that is because the 2k mode is too compressed. At 18000 KBPS, there are artifacts blurring fine details and it is somewhat distracting to see the road go blocky as footage is being played back. In 1080p mode this effect is not as pronounced, but I still do notice that there's an unpleasant 'sparkling' effect of details on the pavement immediately in front of the vehicle as details come into focus from the distance compression. That's not to say the Vantrue has bad video quality - far from it in fact - but if you look at these screen shots comparing an AR0330 camera with the Vantrue the cheap AR camera has more fine details especially on distant objects like the trees and the buildings on the horizon but as you can see the Vantrue has better colour balance. In 2K mode the Vantrue has a little more detail than the AR, but it still has that "sparkle" to it that detracts from the overall quality. Between the two cameras, I find myself unable to decide which I like more. The Vantrue has significantly better colour representation but the AR is just a little sharper and smoother.

Video quality, night:
Night video quality with this camera is very good. When reviewing city footage, I was able to read license plates and street signs easier than with the other cameras I tested and out in the country the camera is able to pick up a good amount of light using just the headlights. Please ignore the smudging around the lights here - that is not a result of any camera error, just a dirty wind shield. Compared to the AR, the Vantrue manages more detail in darker situations, and this is probably the best night footage I've had from a camera so far.

Audio quality:
Audio quality is about average for a camera like this. I found the sound muffled and heavily weighted towards bass tones. It will pick up talking inside of a vehicle just fine, but don't expect to hear anyone outside of the vehicle unless they are really speaking loudly. Here's a sample:

Photo quality:
The Vantrue has a 4MP sensor and it attempts to upscale to 12 megapixels. Unfortunately when doing this it also incorrectly squishes images to a 4:3 ratio when they should be 16:9. Resizing the photos does fix it, and after they are sized to their proper ratio and resolution they look quite good in most lighting situations. But in a modern camera this should not be an issue and is something that Vantrue needs to fix.

Etc:
The battery in this camera lasts a good little while - but not enough to be relied on while in parking mode. I found the battery lasts about 30 minutes in parking mode, so it's best to get it hard wired to the car battery. As a result I didn't get to test the parking mode extensively but it seems to work. The camera seems to have GPS options, but I couldn't get them to work so it must not be built in.

Conclusion:
The design of the R2 is really where Vantrue hit home. I particularly like the included power cable that has its own USB port, the suction mount design and the button layout. The video quality is good during the day and great at night. I wish that this camera was a little more covert when installed and that the video quality didn't have that artifact 'sparkle' to it in the higher definition modes, but it's hard to see the difference in video quality unless it is being directly compared to other cameras. It's up to you to decide if it's worth the extra $100 over the G1W series but if build quality is any indication of reliability I feel like the Vantrue will last longer than a g1w.
 
Last edited:
I would not call the night footag on any OV4689 sensor based camera excellent, but it is good, but to me exelent mean as good as it can get, and OV4689 cameras just isent there.

Your review both say excellent and very good night time footage ? and thats not the same to me.
 
I would not call the night footag on any OV4689 sensor based camera excellent, but it is good, but to me exelent mean as good as it can get, and OV4689 cameras just isent there.

Your review both say excellent and very good night time footage ? and thats not the same to me.

Thanks for the comment. I'll keep that in mind when I'm wording reviews in the future. I've only tested 5 different dash cams and this is the best I've tested so far for night footage - my own interpretation of excellent and very good are similar but I realize others may feel the wording is stronger. Also it's true the sensor plays a big role but there is more to it in terms of good night footage (lens elements, aperture, etc.). I suppose I would call it "Very Good" for city based (with Street lights) and just "Good" for highway/country (only lit with headlights). Hope that clears up any confusion.
 
Yeah when you just have the headlights every dashcam is pretty "poor" at this time, but things are moving in the right direction.

Newer dashcams should soon change that a little, and by that i mean you might be able to see more stuff to the side and further ahead, but it will still suffer from motion blur as the new sensore still need to drop down to the slow exposures to make the good night footage.

But i think thats okay normally i dont bother that much with little things like plate capture day or night, i am happy if it can just log my own driving, and even current dashcams do that pretty good day or night, the rest is just a nice icing on the cake to me.

For testing plate capture is a allright tool to judge what a camera can do, i use that myself with the camera brands i deal with.
 
Thanks for the comment. I'll keep that in mind when I'm wording reviews in the future. I've only tested 5 different dash cams and this is the best I've tested so far for night footage - my own interpretation of excellent and very good are similar but I realize others may feel the wording is stronger. Also it's true the sensor plays a big role but there is more to it in terms of good night footage (lens elements, aperture, etc.). I suppose I would call it "Very Good" for city based (with Street lights) and just "Good" for highway/country (only lit with headlights). Hope that clears up any confusion.
with ov4689 sensor, the picture quality is good at street lights and medium at headlights only. Next time you may want to try a dashcam with IMX322 sony sensor.
 
Back
Top