Its not poor lighting. I had sunglasses on, that's how bright it is. I run the exposure at -0.3ev which takes away the over exposed areas without darkening the dark areas. Gives better detail at day and particularly at night.
This is a good exposure, good light, light from behind, no over saturated areas and no underexposed areas.
Nor was it taken at speed, both cars were relatively slow.
That's why I chose this clip. Its good conditions. If it needs better conditions than this, well you will only get that on 10% of days, and that doesn't explain the difference between the left and the right views.
When I first purchased a V3, the camera was distinctly out of focus on the right side vs the left side. The vendor replaced the camera and the new one has no such issues. So when I first read this post I thought perhaps this was the same manufacturing flaw.
Careful examination of
@dteal's screen shots reveals that there is no problem with this camera. It is simply common everyday motion blur.
Notice that the brick wall which is on the same plane as the front bumper of the car is in sharp focus as are the curb and the lawn at the edge of the road. The white lines painted on the road also appear to be in sharp focus.
View attachment 52732
For it to be motion blur, you would need the car travelling fast, and the blur of the car would be uniform. Correct??
Well the white car was slowing to turn right, so it wasn't fast, maybe 30 kmh.
Secondly the poor focus is not even. The front of the car is blurred, but the side of the car from the A-pillar back (windsreen pillar) is sharp. Look at the B-pillar, that's the one between the two doors. Its sharp as anything. So the blur is not uniform.
As for 60fps, I tried that on my A119s. The file size was about 10% bigger for 2X the number of frames, so the compression is higher. I wasn't expecting double the file size as that is not how video compression works, but 10% is very small. It actually resulted in poorer definition of number plate due to compression artifacts. Also 60fps had noticeably poorer nightime vision. This isnt surprising as 60FPS limits the exposure to than 1/60 sec (obviously), while 30FPS results in exposure of down to 1/30 sec allowing better night time vision.