Smog,fog,air-polution free in USA

The road less traveled :) that's where i want to go.
 
Well, if i remember correctly your country rejected Paris climate accord.
Just saying:whistle:
 
Yes a signature made in Paris make all problems go POOOF to never be seen again.
I taught this was common knowledge :D alongside it is physically impossible to make a girl pregnant in Paris, that's why they have so many hotels in the surrounding towns.
 
Personally i think that humankind will use every drop of oil that is in the ground, i don't know does it matter will we use it fast or slow.
 
Sabe said:
Personally i think that humankind will use every drop of oil that is in the ground, i don't know does it matter will we use it fast or slow.
Click to expand...
That might not be too bad. It is if we use all the coal that there will be total disaster since there is still a huge amount of coal available.

Weekly US coal production surges to highest total in three months
US coal production totaled an estimated 15.6 million st in the week ended December 2, up 11.6% from the prior week and up 8.8% from the year-ago week, US Energy Information Administration data showed Thursday.
Click to expand...
https://www.platts.com/latest-news/...l-production-surges-to-highest-total-10087635

Fortunately most other countries are acting on the Paris agreement.

China's November coal imports down 18.24% on year to 22.05 million mt
Click to expand...
https://www.platts.com/latest-news/...-down-1824-on-year-27895878?ite=45451&ito=796
 
The world should buy Danish wind turbines, then on days with no wind and smog they can use the wind turbines as big fans to blow away the smog, and then run them on nuclear power. :D
Californians could probably now use to seed the wind off the big "fans" with tiny water droplets, cuz i am hearing that it could go very bad over there with wild fires.
 
kamkar1 said:
The world should buy Danish wind turbines, then on days with no wind and smog they can use the wind turbines as big fans to blow away the smog, and then run them on nuclear power. :D
Californians could probably now use to seed the wind off the big "fans" with tiny water droplets, cuz i am hearing that it could go very bad over there with wild fires.
Click to expand...
If you ran them in reverse then you would be blowing the worlds winds in the wrong direction around their circulations, sounds a bit dangerous!

The UK wind turbines are currently generating more power then all our nuclear power plants, so we couldn't do it anyway, looks like Denmark couldn't either : https://en.energinet.dk/ Love the way the map shows you buying energy from Germany and then sending it back round in a circle :D
 
O no we badly need those fusion reactors to come about, cuz until then we are screwed if the wind die down and we will have to crank up our old powerplants.
They must know something i dont when they say we will be 100% renewable energy by 2050 or whatever it is, to me atm that can only happen if the wind always blow, or they find some way to store wind energy for non windy days.

You could go molten salt like some solar plants do for generating power at night, but with wind i think the loss factor will be too great having to melt salt.
Actually most ways i can think of with my little brain are unsustainable / unfeasible.

And i am not getting it, cuz here now a good part of our waste are burned to generate heat / power and to reduce its physical size to something a little country like us can handle.
This is the plant north of Aarhus that burn most if not all waste fron that area of the #2 largest town here.
https://www.google.dk/maps/@56.228773,10.1570544,1056m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=da

A but further out are studstrups værket, but thats a pure coal burner, generating power and heating ( steam ) for Aarhus
https://www.google.dk/maps/@56.2384524,10.3441058,1547a,35y,39.05t/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=da
 
kamkar1 said:
O no we badly need those fusion reactors to come about, cuz until then we are screwed if the wind die down and we will have to crank up our old powerplants.
They must know something i dont when they say we will be 100% renewable energy by 2050 or whatever it is, to me atm that can only happen if the wind always blow, or they find some way to store wind energy for non windy days.

You could go molten salt like some solar plants do for generating power at night, but with wind i think the loss factor will be too great having to melt salt.
Actually most ways i can think of with my little brain are unsustainable / unfeasible.

And i am not getting it, cuz here now a good part of our waste are burned to generate heat / power and to reduce its physical size to something a little country like us can handle.
This is the plant north of Aarhus that burn most if not all waste fron that area of the #2 largest town here.
https://www.google.dk/maps/@56.228773,10.1570544,1056m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=da

A but further out are studstrups værket, but thats a pure coal burner, generating power and heating ( steam ) for Aarhus
https://www.google.dk/maps/@56.2384524,10.3441058,1547a,35y,39.05t/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=da
Click to expand...
Fusion power is still not expected until 2040, not sure you want it since it will put all your wind power companies out of business and that is where a lot of Denmark's wealth comes from!

When you run out of wind we can send you some of ours through the new cable. Over the last week the UK has generated more electricity from wind power than Denmark has used in total. Of course you will have to return it when we run out of wind!
 
Particle pollution seem to form where you are most likely to not see it :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Panzer Platform State I/M Inspection (Smog Check) Your Dash Cam Videos (recorded by you) 21
S Smog,fog,air-polution in a city of Pljevlja-Montenegro Your Dash Cam Videos (recorded by you) 4
Similar threads
State I/M Inspection (Smog Check)
Smog,fog,air-polution in a city of Pljevlja-Montenegro
Back
Top