When it says 120°, that's actually from opposite corners (diagonal), like when measuring display sizes, right?rsilvers said:So I knew they were not being truthful about it being HD, but they also are incorrect about the lens being 120 degrees.
I have mine set to 5min segments and still notice about a one second gap.rsilvers said:I just looked at the time stamp in my files, and that does appear to be true.
I am going to minimize the risk of it occurring at the wrong time by changing the file length to more than a minute on the 027.
dashcam.br said:When it says 120°, that's actually from opposite corners (diagonal), like when measuring display sizes, right?rsilvers said:So I knew they were not being truthful about it being HD, but they also are incorrect about the lens being 120 degrees.
rsilvers said:I don't expect the number of minutes recorded to reduce the duration of the gap. I just mean that the gap will happen less often and so you will be less likely to miss something.
It is important to check for gaps when the card is full. MyRSole said:I would say that the biggest improvement in the "207" is the lack of gaps between recording segments, which the 027 definitely has. (...)
With a class 4 card, full of files, and arsilvers said:I don't expect the number of minutes recorded to reduce the duration of the gap.
When turning at an intersection, I expect a 120 degree camera to cover both lanes of that intersection, which usually are at an 90 degree angle. All cameras I saw seem to cover only about 90 degrees horizontally. This is what I mean:CheckYourLights said:dashcam.br said:When it says 120°, that's actually from opposite corners (diagonal), like when measuring display sizes, right?rsilvers said:So I knew they were not being truthful about it being HD, but they also are incorrect about the lens being 120 degrees.
I'm not good with all the number stuff but here is the Wiki Page on the subject.