- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 10,668
- Reaction score
- 6,561
- Location
- Dublin
- Country
- Ireland
- Dash Cam
- Street Guardian UK / EU / EEA Distributor
This is the follow-up of Night test RX300 vs GT680w where at the same time I was testing as well Panorama II Beta firmware ( v1.11.11 ) which is similar at night to v1.11.13.
Below you may see first video is the same as in my earlier comparison test ( RX300 vs GT680W ) + Panorama II added.
Rest 4 videos are new and you might see that RX300 / GT680W night performance is nearly the same as Panorama II, but please do not take Panorama II as definite final result, because v1.11.11 was only BETA ( test ) version. Panorama II with official v1.08.05 FW is still better than RX300 / GT680w or Panorama II with FW v1.11.11 / v1.11.13.
I may say that RX300 / GT680W has same night performance as Dod LS300W and as I made in the past side by side tests of DOD LS300W vs Panorama II ( test 1, test 2 ), you may see Panorama II with v1.08.05 FW performs better.
I have added into test Panorama II with Beta FW just to see how Firmware tune-up can make a difference.
Anyway, l will move on with videos and bunch of screen shots below.
Videos:
In video Part 3 ( below ) starting 2.55min you can hear annoying warning message which continues till the end of the video clip. There I was testing Over-speed warning ( set to 60km/h), was driving on high-way, - there for this result. I will write more about this in my full review of RX300. So just turn down volume to avoid frustration
.
Same annoying warning message continues in video Part 4 ( below ) till the 3 min 59 sec where I reduced speed below 60km/h. After that lady stopped "swearing"![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
I will post soon complete review of RX300. So as they say: "stay tuned!"![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (10).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (10).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3059-e4133317870a39bc70a2b5aaf7ee5061.jpg?hash=5BMzF4cKOb)
Below you may see first video is the same as in my earlier comparison test ( RX300 vs GT680W ) + Panorama II added.
Rest 4 videos are new and you might see that RX300 / GT680W night performance is nearly the same as Panorama II, but please do not take Panorama II as definite final result, because v1.11.11 was only BETA ( test ) version. Panorama II with official v1.08.05 FW is still better than RX300 / GT680w or Panorama II with FW v1.11.11 / v1.11.13.
I may say that RX300 / GT680W has same night performance as Dod LS300W and as I made in the past side by side tests of DOD LS300W vs Panorama II ( test 1, test 2 ), you may see Panorama II with v1.08.05 FW performs better.
I have added into test Panorama II with Beta FW just to see how Firmware tune-up can make a difference.
Anyway, l will move on with videos and bunch of screen shots below.
Videos:
In video Part 3 ( below ) starting 2.55min you can hear annoying warning message which continues till the end of the video clip. There I was testing Over-speed warning ( set to 60km/h), was driving on high-way, - there for this result. I will write more about this in my full review of RX300. So just turn down volume to avoid frustration
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)
Same annoying warning message continues in video Part 4 ( below ) till the 3 min 59 sec where I reduced speed below 60km/h. After that lady stopped "swearing"
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
I will post soon complete review of RX300. So as they say: "stay tuned!"
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (1).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (1).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3050-033dad89298f833138c259c5e15d601f.jpg?hash=Az2tiSmPgz)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (2).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (2).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3051-c1b4794a2fe692ad008cde26bbbf28b7.jpg?hash=wbR5Si_mkq)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (3).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (3).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3052-4eedd26d8e82c6e8fb9b5d0ca6a1bef4.jpg?hash=Tu3SbY6Cxu)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (4).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (4).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3053-0fa166dd5fc2098aad37bbd24e1d4587.jpg?hash=D6Fm3V_CCY)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (5).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (5).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3054-326656df17bb5d63a0c4ebcf5d3803fd.jpg?hash=MmZW3xe7XW)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (6).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (6).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3055-cb1f0bc591bd6a902a7d1f63febb2f3c.jpg?hash=yx8LxZG9ap)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (7).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (7).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3056-55455aab4f8fcefffac43f90c898a557.jpg?hash=VUVaq0-Pzv)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (8).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (8).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3057-b48f782a9800854be2df08490ea54e7a.jpg?hash=tI94KpgAhU)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (9).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (9).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3058-ce28c3a69fbf96752d1e18d4793621bc.jpg?hash=zijDpp-_ln)
![RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (10).jpg RX300 vs GT680W vs Panorama II v1.11.11 Beta (10).jpg](https://dashcamtalk.com/forum/data/attachments/3/3059-e4133317870a39bc70a2b5aaf7ee5061.jpg?hash=5BMzF4cKOb)
Last edited by a moderator: