Review: Shadow1s (Sony EXMOR IMX322)

Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
67
Reaction score
41
Location
Minsk
Country
Belarus
Dash Cam
dp220, p2, pS
Shadow1s> another newcomer Sony EXMOR (IMX322) based DVR



Look & Feel:

img_1589-jpg.24380

img_1590-jpg.24381


Technically as it known it is a china cloned Sony IMX322 sensor + Ambarella A7 chipset.
Also I need to mention that instead of Li-Ion battery Super Capacitor is used. So the durability is much more better. Capacitors works good in any conditions and never dies in winter (temperature below zero).
Ambarella A7 is good for customizing so it might be important for DVR-enthusiasts.

I very like mounting like Shadow's. The best formfactor for stealth in-car installation. Dashcam can be masked as a standart car equipment and completely hidden outside the vehicle.

img_1593-jpg.24382

img_1594-jpg.24383


Day:



day_1_comp-jpg.24387

DR is not so good as it was in my prev test - Anytek A3. The same sensor, but no details in a highlights and no details in blacks. In the same time Transcend DP220 without any problems shows much more information in such contrast scenes.



day_3_comp-jpg.24386

Wide angle is another problem. As per number plates on the snapshot - details are missing.




Night:



night_2_comp_ss-jpg.24391

night_3_comp-jpg.24388


Again disappointing. It was promised to show incredible night vision. But in fact in just the same as it was for Anytek A3. And no any close to Panorama2 based on the original Sony IMX122.

I've tried to test Shadow1s agains my home IPCAM based on original IMX122 with working night mode:

Compare with IPCAM


Yes. As you can see night mode in shadow1s is just a fake. There is no any night performance in a grayscale. It just de-saturation and nothing mode.



File information

General
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : JVT
Codec ID : avc1 (avc1/isom)
Overall bit rate mode : Constant
Overall bit rate : 16.2 Mbps
AMBA :
Video
Bit rate : 16.0 Mbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) fps
Color space : YUV


Final conclusion

Day quality is not so good as prev reviewed Anytek A3. View angle is too wide and that is the issue - detalization always poor with wide lenses.
Strange thing is the Dynamic range. It is surprisingly low and I can not explain why. Anytek's DR was definitely better in high contrast scenes.
The worse thing - the Night quality. It was promised some superb technologies with the grayscale night mode. But in fact it is just a fake.
GS mode just does not work at all and there is no any difference with the colored picture of any revival.
And overal night picture is still not true Sony night-vision. Both Anytek A3 and Shadow1s are far far away from real IMX122/IMX322 capabilities.

Original article for Russian spoken : http://andrei.krutsko.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry160711-134145

+ full video review
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1589.jpg
    IMG_1589.jpg
    863.1 KB · Views: 124
  • IMG_1590.jpg
    IMG_1590.jpg
    625.5 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_1593.jpg
    IMG_1593.jpg
    865.3 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_1594.jpg
    IMG_1594.jpg
    820.3 KB · Views: 123
  • IMG_1590.jpg
    IMG_1590.jpg
    625.5 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_1591.jpg
    IMG_1591.jpg
    644.4 KB · Views: 16
  • day_3_comp.jpg
    day_3_comp.jpg
    195.3 KB · Views: 117
  • day_1_comp.jpg
    day_1_comp.jpg
    129.6 KB · Views: 118
  • night_3_comp.jpg
    night_3_comp.jpg
    120.4 KB · Views: 116
  • night_2_comp_ss.jpg
    night_2_comp_ss.jpg
    156.3 KB · Views: 119
Last edited:
Very good review and I agree with you that video (resolution and color) quality is not as good. WDR is not impressive at all. Their software developers have a long way to go.

I was disappointed by the quality, given its sensor and processor are good.
 
Back
Top