DashCamManToo
Member
In my research, I have found that there are basic criteria to consider when weighing the pros and cons of various brands and their products.
Image Quality
If you know anything about video cameras and video recordings, there can never be enough resolution or frame rate. The bottom line is that it will always depend upon the processing power of the hardware in the device. Every year the circuitry gets smaller and more powerful; just like in computers.
This means that we should buy the latest and greatest that we can justify spending our hard-earned money upon. If you can afford an extra fifty or one hundred dollars on better quality video imaging, you may reasonably consider thinking seriously about it. It only makes it better in the long run, because your more powerful camera will be useful longer than a less powerful one, and you will begin reaping the benefits immediately. (Besides, having to learn a new device's idiosyncrasies is always a pain. You don't want to be forced to do that too often.)
The video quality is made up of resolution and frame-rate. Some people like to talk about bit-rate, compression and other factors, but these are things that are based upon the hardware capabilities and there is little difference between brands. It isn't a high-end computer you're buying, so this is not going to be a worry for you. Just keep it simple.
The current high-end video resolution is 4K. This equals 3840 X 2160 pixels, and is called UHD or Ultra High Definition. It is about 4 times the quality of 1080p (a 'p' at the end is about twice as good as an 'i' at the end), or HD (High Definition) at 1920x1080. One can go to 8K, but not in dash cams. Yet.
Just ask yourself, "Would you buy a new television that was not at least 4K?" Of course not. So perhaps the first consideration should be 4K if possible.
Next is frame-rate. This is the number of full screen scans that are recorded per second. Remember that old-time movies were jerky because of very low frame-rates, and our eyes could see the delay between one full scan of the screen and another.
Right now we can enjoy viewing at 30fps, or frames per second. Very good is 60fps. However, most front cams can only offer 30fps at 4K. Again, this is the limitation of the hardware.
This gets a little more compromising when you add a rear and/or interior camera to the front one. Because there is only one processing circuit board in the base unit, the system can only only split the quality so many ways, and the front camera usually gets the priority. Also, the manufacturer will probably only offer an HD camera for the rear or interior.
So there are the current limitations in video quality. I have seen at least one cam that offered a setting of up to 120fps, but I found that to be unnecessary and especially if they lower the resolution to compensate. Therefore we may wish to look for 4K at 30fps.
Image Quality
If you know anything about video cameras and video recordings, there can never be enough resolution or frame rate. The bottom line is that it will always depend upon the processing power of the hardware in the device. Every year the circuitry gets smaller and more powerful; just like in computers.
This means that we should buy the latest and greatest that we can justify spending our hard-earned money upon. If you can afford an extra fifty or one hundred dollars on better quality video imaging, you may reasonably consider thinking seriously about it. It only makes it better in the long run, because your more powerful camera will be useful longer than a less powerful one, and you will begin reaping the benefits immediately. (Besides, having to learn a new device's idiosyncrasies is always a pain. You don't want to be forced to do that too often.)
The video quality is made up of resolution and frame-rate. Some people like to talk about bit-rate, compression and other factors, but these are things that are based upon the hardware capabilities and there is little difference between brands. It isn't a high-end computer you're buying, so this is not going to be a worry for you. Just keep it simple.
The current high-end video resolution is 4K. This equals 3840 X 2160 pixels, and is called UHD or Ultra High Definition. It is about 4 times the quality of 1080p (a 'p' at the end is about twice as good as an 'i' at the end), or HD (High Definition) at 1920x1080. One can go to 8K, but not in dash cams. Yet.
Just ask yourself, "Would you buy a new television that was not at least 4K?" Of course not. So perhaps the first consideration should be 4K if possible.
Next is frame-rate. This is the number of full screen scans that are recorded per second. Remember that old-time movies were jerky because of very low frame-rates, and our eyes could see the delay between one full scan of the screen and another.
Right now we can enjoy viewing at 30fps, or frames per second. Very good is 60fps. However, most front cams can only offer 30fps at 4K. Again, this is the limitation of the hardware.
This gets a little more compromising when you add a rear and/or interior camera to the front one. Because there is only one processing circuit board in the base unit, the system can only only split the quality so many ways, and the front camera usually gets the priority. Also, the manufacturer will probably only offer an HD camera for the rear or interior.
So there are the current limitations in video quality. I have seen at least one cam that offered a setting of up to 120fps, but I found that to be unnecessary and especially if they lower the resolution to compensate. Therefore we may wish to look for 4K at 30fps.