lazy reviewers, (or ones with vested interests) will often take the bulk of their review content from pre supplied material from the supplier of the product
Just the opposite. Unless the reviews are dishonest, smart businesses respond to indications that their products are not working in the real world.
Amazon is moving slow but at least they're moving which is a good thing Just read an article about another electronics company getting de-listed and they mentioned that "RavPower" had been de-listed earlier. IIRC some folks here use powerbanks by them.
I've got nothing against "professional reviewers" as long as they're honest and don't try to hide faults; we've got a few of them among our ranks here. I don't know how they acquire their cams but they seem to do good reviews. One in particular answers questions quickly so I know they've had to have done a thorough job to have the answers that fast from their memory and not having to look them up in a manual or online.
But I've seen the other kind elsewhere online- too many of them. If a site shuts them down they'll pop up elsewhere, or with places like Amazon and Ebay just register another account in a different name and keep going
Phil
we have 100% positive feedback score on eBay but some of the replies are just like that, when you check the user history they generally use the same phrase on every single purchase
No RavPower powerbanks available on Amazon UK. As mentioned earlier, its a shame they resorted to such tactics since they made good products. I have long-serving powerbanks from both RavPower and Aukey. I bought an Anker one last month - wonder if they will disappear too?
Yup. I've actually read the reviews on many listings which I don't think very many people bother to do, at least in any depth. Only a small percentage discuss the actual product attributes. I think people (well at least some of them) feel obligated to say something but don't want to spend any time on the process. Something like how we might say "Good Morning" to a stranger we pass, while neither meaning anything by what we've said or actually caring about them. Or returning the same greeting simply because you're "supposed to do that".
Yeah, it's sad to see good products go away simply because someone broke the rules, which with how the system functions is almost necessary for a company to remain competitive at Amazon. Aukey weren't bad cams, and even Apeman had a little value in being one of the better cheap cams. Vava who is also de-listed certain deserved it with their overt flaunting of the rules in offering $40 gift cards for 5-star reviews. I don't know if Anker plays the game- I hope not- as they don't really need to; they do excellent products which will gain them all the positivity they could want. But so did RavPower...
If Amazon removes the better or best products we the people lose as much or more than the companies making them Yes, we can still buy those products elsewhere, but most people aren't going to do that unless they're already seeking that exact product. The majority of the people are just going to go to Amazon and buy whatever they can find there, which could end up with them needlessly getting inferior products 
Shame on you.
What's wrong with you boy!?!? He had the hots for you and you broke his sweet and tender heart!!!Well a few weeks ago, some guy tried to kiss me,,,,, on the cheek mind you.
I had to brush him off cuz i am not that kind of guy ( the hugging or kissing kind, i am barely a give hand guy as i dont believe touching hands is that much of a sign of mutual respect )
And i never seen him before, i just got into the shell gas station and they ( behind the counter ) was talking about phones not lasting long, and i just made a comment to that that my phones last plenty long.
I was like what the hell possess you to kiss another person just like that, and not least a person of the same sex, i just dont get that even if i am aware of my devilish good looks
I do know there apparently is a agenda to femizise boys in Denmark, and it start at day #1 in schoo
I'm sure this is correct. And TBH it could have a wider range of effect than a lot of people realize
No shame, they're the ones wanting dishonest reviews.
