.....You'd need to see simultaneously shot raw footage from both cameras to judge the difference......
I have seen side-by-side comparison of the DP100 and DP200. The small difference in performance relative to price wasn't enough to sway the decision towards the DP200. It's the capacitor which could sway a decision.
...You recently said in another post ... "it's capacitor cams only for me, from now on. Which basically cuts my future dashcam-purchase shortlist right down to just a handful, plus maybe a few others which have slipped my mind at present".....
Yes, I said that and I intend to try to use capacitor cams wherever reasonably possible in the future when cams need replacing (although I'd probably try replacing the battery on any of our battery cams which fail).
I placed an order for a JooVuu recently which I'm hoping to receive in a week or two. I normally prefer a screen but I made an exception. And a Panorama replaced my 402G, making two cap cams.
However, I didn't like the Panorama's wide angle in the front of my car due to the way it changes perception of what's happening and viewer perception of how I'm driving, so it now sits in the rear of the family car with its wide angle well-suited to the almost vertical rear window of 'estate' type cars.
But I'll make a few exceptions regarding 'only' buying capacitor cams......
Such as the recent rear cam which my wife wanted to add.
We thought long and hard about the DP200 but the relatively small capacitor of the DP200 would make it unsuitable for our cars because although we do 25-30k between us each year, unusual work patterns and driving patterns would mean numerous occasions each year when one or more of our cars sit idle for several days and the cam would need re-setting.
The other capacitor cams available are generally rather expensive to justify using as rear cams; costing two or three times as much as the DP100.