- Joined
- Jan 27, 2013
- Messages
- 52,470
- Reaction score
- 30,344
- Location
- Sydney, Australia ~ Shenzhen, China
- Country
- Australia
- Dash Cam
- Too many ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If the budget allows have a look at the new Innovv C5, it's made for motorbike use
Hey, just finished reading this thread. Wanted to get two Mobius 1 with waterproof cases for motorcycle use. But really wanted that 60FPS. Though with the (Mobius2&) night video being as terrible as I've seen here, I am not sure what to do now. Though there's no case for the '2' I thought it'd be much easier to waterproof it with it's design and all! Doh! I guess It's back to being happy with 30 FPS and ordering the Mobius 1?
. (There a few others to look at as well. There's one @jokiin has recommended but I can't think of the name at the moment.)
the Cycliq Fly6 and Fly12 (maybe the ones you've seen me mention) are very popular bicycle cameras, don't think they'd work well for motorcycle use though
https://cycliq.com/
Do it spit out true 120 FPS or do it double some frames as it cant do 120 FPS as it use a slower than 1/120 S exposure.
One would assume 120 FPS would mean considerable less motion blur and also darker footage in these less than favorable lighting conditions.
Which SW on this M2?I was wondering if the 720p120 video this morning was hampered by compression due to my settings of h.264 and standard bitrate (VBR approx 24kbps). So I decided to give the M2 one last chance, using the highest bitrate setting (VBR approx 36kbps) and h.265 for the least possible compression.
The results:
1. No improvement in video quality
2. Video recording became "unstable" - see clip below
3. RTC affected by video glitches The time skips forward during unstable sections. Clip duration should have been 5:00min. Actual durations 4:55, 4:40, 4:19, 3:32....
It's on 2.08Which SW on this M2?
Peter said to us that its newer 2.10.6 FW to be much superior to the prior beta versions,its exposure and low light details are much superior to the M1, and visibly better than the samples shot with M2 2.08 FW. So,we wonder if you can email Peter directly for its newer FW,ok?It's on 2.08
I'm not part of the testing team, nor do I have Peter's email.Peter said to us that its newer 2.10.6 FW to be much superior to the prior beta versions,its exposure and low light details are much superior to the M1, and visibly better than the samples shot with M2 2.08 FW. So,we wonder if you can email Peter directly for its newer FW,ok?