I am sure a case or claim will not get dismissed here if it was hinging on being able to play video evidence or not, in that case the other part would just have to take my "word" as is, or whey would have to outsource the footage to a trusted place that would be able to convert it so they will be able to view it and then argue against it if they can.
While we Danes and you Americans do have a sort of similar setup, then it still seem like things are not quite the same or working the same way.
Off course i can not go into specifics as i don't have a profound understanding or exposure to either system, but i would be very disappointed if my case got dismissed for reasons like not being able to play what is after all a fairly standard format.