I will take a look. My primary concern is that wiki pages are great for "generally accepted" information but may not be the best for reviews since there are vested interests between manufacturers, retailers, users who are big fans and disgruntled users. Obtaining consensus will be difficult, resulting in pages that will not help a user reach a buying decision.
I can give you an example. When I was looking at forum software, I narrowed it down to 2 solutions, vBulletin and Xenforo. If you look at their Wikipedia pages there is not enough information to make a purchasing decision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VBulletin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XenForo
They don't provide enough "real world" experience. It has the facts that I guess conflicting parties can agree on but not much more than that.
The key points that swayed me to Xenforo are NOT in the wiki pages. Apparently over 40% of vBulletin users are running version 3.8 which is 2 generations old (See
here and
here). People are not upgrading to v4 and definitely not v5. Note that v3 was originally released in 2004. Also you can see people migrating away from vBulletin.
Also look at this
thread "showcasing" vBulletin v5 sites. Many sites who migrated to v5 gave up and switched to other solutions. Others complain about performance and there are really only a few small forums running v5. None of these points are mentioned in the wiki pages.
So, if I come across a popular review site that utilizes Wiki pages and works better than what we have now, I will consider it.