It seems that it may be focused in too closely- everything is sharp up close but not in the distance. Still pretty good though so consider that a minor complaint. The over-temp issue is more serious. If that occurred while driving one could miss it, or at best fiddling with the cam to dismiss the warning distracts you- not good while driving 😱
Overall I think they're getting close but haven't quite yet hit the target- dashcam needs are not the same as action cams or GPS units and it seems more that they don't understand those needs than a lack of quality overall. Other than the mount it appears that some minor tweaking at the factory and with firmware could fix these things 😉
If their designers get more aligned to our specific needs Garmin will apparently be a strong contender in the market 😎
Thanks to all for sharing your experiences 👍
Phil
There is a lot to like about 55:
- build is solid
- excellent sound
- menu and settings are very polished
- side buttons are good size not hard to press, but have a nice "click" feel
- GPS performance is stellar (instant lock in my garage)
- Date/Time settings (or the lack of, automatically setup even time zone/DST)
- all "driver assist" functions work as advertised (Forward collision warning, LDWS, Traffic moving)
- voice control - it actually works very well. On other cams I can never remember which button takes a picture or mutes microphone...
- available park mode module
- inexpensive extra mounts available to purchase
Don't like:
- recording quality (low bit rate)
- battery instead of capacitor
- no video out or HDMI
- file naming
- GPS info embedded in video files
Don't know yet:
- mount - It's a good idea, very low foot print, camera is easily adjustable after mounting. Not sure how stable it will be...
That's all for now.