Yeah focus do look a little soft, and you will never be able to read plates on cars you keep a safe distance to, at least not if you and i have the same idea about what safe is.
Its the problem of the wide angle lenses on dashcameras, they mess up distance feeling in footage and by dooing so allso ruin ther own chance of getting a plate capture at a fairly modest distance.
Even with my just about 50 year old eyes i can be at a distance where i can read plates allright myself, but in the footage the car is far avay and there is no plate capture.
To change this you will need a narrow FOV lens about 4 - 6 mm, this will make the car and the plate on it appear in the footage just about as you see it live, bud for that gain you will miss a lot of the stuff going on at the side as a 4 - 6 mm lens is down at 90 degrees FOV and less.
I an contemplating a "long range" lens on a camera beside my wide angle front camera, and its this or maybe the new Lukas/qvia that have optical zoom, but this is a pretty new product so no word out yet about the benefits of that zoom lens and how it behave in its auto mode.
Now it do sound like i am pretty focussed about plate capture, but truth be told it dont bother me that much, even with hit and run on the rise here in DK, for the most i just rely on my cameras dokumenting i dont do anything stupid, and if i dont do that then my insurance and a court of law will be in my favor.
But offcourse traffic stuff rarely get into a court of law here, for the most the insurance companies work it out among them self.
PS. a trick you can use for plates is seeing them yourself and then call them out for the microfone of the camera to capture, this is highly usefull at night where its no way near possibel to capture a plate that is moving at more than a crawl.
Low light performance of dashcams is the #1 challenge, and most companies know this, but dont have the tech to deliver, at least not to a price a regular human can pay.