I think there is a typo, did you mean to say the Pro low bitrate parking mode is nowhere as efficient as the Plus?Preliminary Power Consumption
Keep in mind these figures may change with firmware updates.
Q: Why is power consumption important?
A: Usually the more power a dash cam uses the more heat it will generate.
And it will indicate how long it will operate in a parking mode.
Well no wonder the A229 Plus runs 28℉ (16℃) degrees cooler than the A229 Pro in 3-CH configuration.
I measured the power consumption of the A229 Plus & A229 Pro consecutively, using identical settings, and the same Hardwire Kit.
I remember reading different SD Cards can affect power consumption & operating temperature so I used the same Viofo brand 512GB SD Card.
A229 Plus: 2K + 2K + 1080p Firmware V1.0 0922
A229 Pro: 4K + 2K + 1080p Firmware V1.0 0926
Maximum Bitrate
HDR On
IR LED’s Off
Wi-Fi Off
LCD Screen Off
Normal Recording Mode
489mA @ 12.60V = 6.16 Watts (A229 Plus)
631mA @ 12.60V = 7.95 Watts (A229 Pro)
Low Bitrate Parking Mode
453mA @ 12.60V = 5.71 Watts (A229 Plus)
496mA @ 12.60V = 6.25 Watts (A229 Pro)
Two things stand out at me.
1.) In Normal Recording Mode the A229 Plus uses considerably less power than the A229 Pro, (1.79 Watts).
2.) The A229 Plus Low Bitrate Parking Mode is no where near efficient as the A229 Pro.
View attachment 67982
View attachment 67983 View attachment 67984
Doesn't the Pro knock down to 2k in parking mode, does that mean the Plus knocks down to 1080p or also 2k? Interesting that there's a big difference in power if both are in 2k in parking mode.
So the Plus should get over 10% longer parking recording before shut-off right.
I wanted a fancy 4k image but the Plus is looking like a better value...