Just more BS, propaganda. twisting of the facts and USA bashing, Nigel. I mean, what else could we expect from you?
Almost as absurd as counting someone who has a positive test and then gets run over by a bus 6 months later as a covid death, just because they once had a positive test and may never have become ill!
This entire pandemic is only six months old, so using an analogy about a person getting run over by a bus six months after testing positive is absurd and misleading.
Oh great, you cite an article from more than four months ago in early May, quoting a medical advisor mentioning an average from yet a month earlier in early April during the initial period of the pandemic when well over 1000 people were dying per day in the UK and hospitals were desperately trying to open up new hospital beds to make room for new COVID victims.
Also, at that time, early in the pandemic, little was known about the illness and it was thought to be merely a severe respiratory disease. Since that time, it has been shown to affect and permanently damage multiple organ systems and to be a severe vascular disease that causes illness and mortality well beyond the initial phases of the disease. When someone recovering from COVID-19 then later dies of a stroke or a heart attack or liver failure directly due to the damage from the disease, the UK now dismisses these deaths as actually having been caused by coronavirus if the death occurs more than 28 days after the patient first tested positive, How convenient!
I could understand if the UK had changed the time period for COVID deaths among those who test positive more conservatively, say 60 days, but to cut all the way back to 28 days considering the evidence is highly suspect! It suggests an agenda.
The changes in the UK count are aimed at getting it to match the excess death count and thus be as accurate as possible.
This is the "cooking the books" at work, along with some slick explanatory rhetoric. Yet somehow, the 65,000 excess deaths can't seem to be explained away even after abruptly dropping the death rate by well over 5,000.
In USA, volunteers need to be paid?
Another major clinical trial is underway in the global race for a COVID-19 vaccine โ with researchers this time planning to pay participants hundreds of dollars in Palm Beach County. The experimental vaccine, called AZD1222, wasโฆ
www.sun-sentinel.com
These vaccine testing participants are being asked by a private, for profit
clinical research center, that is engaged in a wide variety of investigative studies for the medical and pharmaceutical industry to engage in a rigorous study that will go one for two years. Rather than exploit these people who have willingly committed to two years of further testing and follow-up examinations, they are offering them modest payment during a time when many folks are otherwise out of work and trying to find a way to pay their bills and keep a roof over their heads. Apparently, AstraZeneca is funding payment to the vaccine research study participants as they are the party that engaged Headlands Research and their subsidiary J
EM Research Institute. AstraZeneca received $1 billion from the U.S. Health Department's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and some of that Federal funding is a source for the payments to these US citizens who volunteer as vaccine study participants within the US.
Of course, you Nigel, attempt to use a news blurb without all the facts, to once again engage in USA bashing and slights. It's truly, despicable and yes, simply yet another example of you violating the rules of the forum. Your behavior, attitude and open scorn for the United States and other nations on this forum is shameful.