Welcome to the forum Donthitme.
Resolution are good for you Americans as you have smaller plates / letters.
But that is under ideal circumstances.
When light levels fade a camera will expose a picture or a frame in a video longer, this introduce motion blur as the "target" move while the picture is being taken, so this will also make a plate impossible to read.
Having a higher FPS count like 60 FPS, this just mean the camera can not use a slower than 1:60 second exposure for each frame in the video. BUT ! 60 FOS are still very very slow in regard to anything faster than a baby crawling across a floor.
A rule of thumb i learned in photo class in school was if you take a picture of something moving ( i assume they meant humans unaided ) you need a exposure time of at least 1:250 second.
Razor sharp pictures of a race car you see, those are probably taken with a 1:XXxxx second exposure, there is a reason exposure timings on a camera go way over several thousands of a second.
Dash and action cameras have the downside of not having a aperture, so we can not use that to compensate for the level of light reaching the sensor, so the only 2 knobe such cameras have to use are exposure time and ISO ( sensitivity )
Action camera users some times use ND filters, which are like shades for the lens, to reduce the amount of light coming thru to the sensor and so being able to use a slow exposure time even in bright light, and so you can have some motion blur in your footage even if its taken in bright sunshine.
And apparently some degree of motion blur are " cinematic"
But a 30 FPS camera might still use the same exposure as a 60 FPS camera unless we are right there at the end of exposure timings, years ago i ran 2 identical cameras beside each other, one set to 60 FPS and the other to 30 FPS.
And after weeks of looking at their footage i came to the conclusion that it was extremely rare the 60 FOS camera got a capture the 30 FPS camera did not get, so since then i have just used 30 FPS footage.
Also as the bitrate are most often the same for both FPS settings, then using 60 FPS mean your total bitrate will be spread out over more frames, and so if you like in a thinner layer, so with 30 FPS the bitrate should be used better and so give a better image quality.
One thing i find most important for you guys over there is the 1 plate issue, so if you are in a 1 plate state, and that one plate are in the back of the car, well a oncoming car that side swipe you, your front camera will get nothing other than the make / model / color of the car.
So i think having 2 channel systems with a rear camera are a must, at least that camera will then have a theoretical chance of getting a plate capture of the plate in the back of the car.
BUT ! dont focus too much on plate capture, if you do you just stand a chance of getting let down no matter what camera you get, CUZ it is still very much a challenge.
I do use it myself in testing cameras, but really under good conditions just about any camera can do that ( Danish highway speeds of 80 KMH / 50 MPH ) and our large easy to read plate front and rear.
As soon as the light level fade, okay the not so good cameras fall by the wayside first, but it is not like it is several hours earlier in the day then a good camera do the same.
This video made wit the old Viofo A139 system ( 1440p resolution ) are right on the limit, you can also see that on the plates when there are trees along the road that make the light level lower and so the camera change to settings that accommodate that.
Add a splash of summer / more light and plates are captured much sharper as the camera can use faster exposure times.