EricSan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2023
- Messages
- 1,408
- Reaction score
- 1,066
- Location
- Central PA
- Country
- United States
- Dash Cam
- There are ALWAYS user serviceable parts inside!
Here are some images from the rear cameras. The N4S rear camera is higher resolution and a somewhat smaller angle of view (and thus, less visual distortion for horizontal lines) than the A139Pro. Both suffer from not having a polarizer lens attached, as you can see the rear dash reflected in the window. The Moiré effect caused by the fabric pattern of the rear dash is more clearly prominent on the N4S, I presume this is a function of the higher level of digital compression that Vantrue uses.
This comparison is a bit more of a mixed bag for me. I appreciate the overall lower level of distortion and greater linearity present in the N4S camera. The wider field of view with the A139Pro introduces obvious barrel distortion, though the higher bit rate of the A139Pro results in less digital noise as a result of the reflection of the fabric of the rear dash in the window. Overall detail and readability of the N4S image are much greater, see the crops below. As you can tell with a few of the shadows, both camera lenses are in the full sun due to the direction of travel.
N4S Rear Camera, 2560x1440 resolution:
And here is the view at exactly the same point in time (bumper just touching the start of the cross walk) from the Viofo A139Pro rear camera, 1920x1080. Due to the wider field of view from the Viofo, the car looks further away and you can see more on the periphery of the image. Due to the higher bit rate, though, the Viofo features a more smooth looking rear dash.
And the corresponding crops of the banner that is strung across the road in the above images. Greater resolution clearly helps the N4S produce more readable text in the banner when compared to the A139Pro rear camera. The N4S rear camera picks up a bit more color detail in the banner as well, particularly in the letters of the word "Music."
N4S Rear Camera Crop:
A139Pro Rear Camera Crop:
This comparison is a bit more of a mixed bag for me. I appreciate the overall lower level of distortion and greater linearity present in the N4S camera. The wider field of view with the A139Pro introduces obvious barrel distortion, though the higher bit rate of the A139Pro results in less digital noise as a result of the reflection of the fabric of the rear dash in the window. Overall detail and readability of the N4S image are much greater, see the crops below. As you can tell with a few of the shadows, both camera lenses are in the full sun due to the direction of travel.
N4S Rear Camera, 2560x1440 resolution:
And here is the view at exactly the same point in time (bumper just touching the start of the cross walk) from the Viofo A139Pro rear camera, 1920x1080. Due to the wider field of view from the Viofo, the car looks further away and you can see more on the periphery of the image. Due to the higher bit rate, though, the Viofo features a more smooth looking rear dash.
And the corresponding crops of the banner that is strung across the road in the above images. Greater resolution clearly helps the N4S produce more readable text in the banner when compared to the A139Pro rear camera. The N4S rear camera picks up a bit more color detail in the banner as well, particularly in the letters of the word "Music."
N4S Rear Camera Crop:
A139Pro Rear Camera Crop:
Last edited: