That compilation video is perfect proof that red light cameras don't work. I'm sure at most, if not all of those intersections there were signs warning drivers of the cameras. So why did they choose to run a solid red light, and in the process total their vehicles? Simple. The didn't. They didn't try to beat the light (like most fractional red-light runners). They simply did not see it. Whether sleep, distracted, drunk, or otherwise impaired, the cameras made ZERO difference.
Yet, videos like this are shown to city councils across the US as proof why they need the cameras. They somehow prevent accidents like this. No. They do provide entertaining forensic evidence AFTER the crash occurred, but they did nothing to prevent them.
What they do accomplish is ticketing fractional red-light runners - those who deliberately try to beat the light, but miss it by less than a second. Those "fractional runners" pose zero safety risk since they are well within the ALL-RED period by the time the clear the intersection. But those are the ones who are ticketed... And rightfully so.
The other thing these cameras do is turn the yellow cycle into an all-out PANIC stop for some motorists. That's a recipe for disaster when the trailing vehicle is bigger, heavier, and has a longer stopping distance - who is not expecting the driver ahead of him to slam on the brakes the instant the light turns yellow.
Another (debatably) well-intentioned .gov action that does nothing to stop the intended ailment (redlight crashes), and instead increases the potential for accidents. Many FL cities have broken their contracts with the various camera vendors to have the cameras removed. Ironically, not because of safety (even though an increasing number of studies now proves accident rates increase at camera intersections), but because the ticket revenue guarantees are falling well short of contract minimums - costing cities millions of dollars. And how many politicians are held accountable?