VIOFO A229 Plus - Testing / Review - RCG

Thanks for the review.

Is the A229 Pro worth the 60$ more (Considering I don't need to buy CPL as it is included with the Pro) than A229 Plus?

And did you test the heat output? This is very important for me because I live in a hot country.
I know the A229 Pro comes with heatsink while the Plus does not. But since it uses more bitrate, higher video quality (4K) and different SoC - Could it be generating more heat?
 
 
I ran a power consumption test with firmware v1.2_240227 installed using an A229 Plus 1CH configuration. I tested the four parking modes with and without the GPS enabled in parking mode via the new setting in this firmware version.

1709591516562.webp

With the GPS configured to be left on during parking mode (old behavior), the power consumption results were virtually identical to my previous test with firmware v1.0_23117 installed. With the GPS disabled during parking mode, there was a reduction of about 0.12W to 0.14W (10 mA to 11 mA @ 12.6V). This increased the projected parking mode recording times by about 100 minutes.
 
While recording in parking mode with the power bank, it does not switch to normal recording mode when the car starts moving. Is there a way to solve this?
 

Attachments

  • a229 plus settings2.webp
    a229 plus settings2.webp
    46.9 KB · Views: 126
  • a229 plus settings1.webp
    a229 plus settings1.webp
    45.4 KB · Views: 129
While recording in parking mode with the power bank, it does not switch to normal recording mode when the car starts moving. Is there a way to solve this?
The new setting for the GPS being turned off in parking mode is not present in the VIOFO app yet. I would recommend updating the setting that turns off the GPS while in parking mode to test if that helps with your issue.

A229 Pro
a229_pro_12_240227_settings.png

A229 Plus
a229_plus_12_240227_settings.webp
 
The new setting for the GPS being turned off in parking mode is not present in the VIOFO app yet. I would recommend updating the setting that turns off the GPS while in parking mode to test if that helps with your issue.

A229 Pro
View attachment 71332

A229 Plus
View attachment 71333
Yes, the problem is solved, thank you bro
 
The A229 Plus and A229 Pro firmware updates that updated the front camera firmware to v1.3.1_241024 and the rear camera firmware (same for both models) to v1.3_241022 seems to have introduced a bug related to parking mode rear camera delayed recording startup and filename suffix sequence number assignment issues [out of order]. I reported this issue to VIOFO and they are investigating the issue. On Monday, I supplied additional info to VIOFO regarding the A229 Plus rear camera low bitrate parking mode issues.

I updated my A229 Pro 2CH (with rear camera) to the same updated versions (front) v1.3.1_241024 (for the A229 Pro) and (rear) v1.3_241022. Today, I drove my car with the A229 Pro and the same issue occurred with that configuration.

Issue 1: Delayed rear camera recording start during [low bitrate] parking mode

A229 Plus - Low Bitrate Example 1 - Delayed Recording Start

Note the filename timestamps for the front and then for the corresponding rear camera video file. The A229 Plus rear camera starts recording four (4) seconds after the front camera. That same offset file rotation persists during the entire parking mode session. When I examine the video contents of the files, the rear camera is truly offset by four (4) seconds from the front camera.

A229 Plus - Low Bitrate Example 1 - Odd filename sequence number assignment

Typically, the front video file's sequence number for the filename suffix is 'n'. The initial 'n' value for parking mode is usually the highest sequence number used during normal recording mode with one (1) added to it. The rear video file's sequence number for its filename suffix is 'n+1'.

In this example, the first low bitrate front camera video filename sequence number is 1054. The first low bitrate rear camera video filename sequence number is 1056. Sequence number 1055 isn't used until the first front camera file rotation occurs. That same odd sequence number assignment pattern continues during the entire parking mode session.

1730234791807.webp


When the A229 Plus (or Pro) returns to normal recording mode, the sequence number assignments are sequential as you would expect them to be:

1730235303369.webp


A229 Pro - Example:

The same odd low bitrate filename suffix sequence number issue that occurred with the A229 Plus 2CH (with rear camera) occurred during both low bitrate parking sessions for the A229 Pro 2CH. The rear camera starting to record a few seconds (3) after the front camera occurred during the second low bitrate parking mode session, but not the first. I only drove my car to the local post office and to a local store before returning home. The entire trip lasted less than one hour.

Here is a listing of files created by the A229 Pro 2CH (with rear camera) during the two low bitrate parking mode sessions:

1730235546721.webp


Here is a listing of files created by the A229 Pro 2CH during the normal recording sessions. The odd sequence number issue does not occur during normal recording mode, only during [low bitrate] parking mode.

1730235614552.webp
 

Attachments

  • 1730235879321.webp
    1730235879321.webp
    85 KB · Views: 122
I saved some A229 PRO 2 CH Low Bit Rate parking files from August - before I updated the front camera to V1.3.1_240913

I'm seeing the same anomaly of strange sequencing pointed out by @rcg530
Why are we suggesting this was introduced with the newer 1024 firmware?

I have not looked into the delayed rear camera issue yet

screenshot_140.png
 
I saved some A229 PRO 2 CH Low Bit Rate parking files from August - before I updated the front camera to V1.3.1_240913

I'm seeing the same anomaly of strange sequencing pointed out by @rcg530
Why are we suggesting this was introduced with the newer 1024 firmware?

I have not looked into the delayed rear camera issue yet

View attachment 74859
Yes, the odd sequence numbers can/have occurred with older firmware versions as well. When I observed that behavior before, the dash camera had been in operation for extended periods of time and the problem would only occur during longer parking mode sessions.

The current sequence number issue occurs from the very beginning of each parking mode session. The second issue of the rear camera having a three to four second delay before it starts recording in parking mode is a new behavior. VIOFO has stated they have replicated the two behaviors after I reported the issue to them. They are investigating the issue(s).
 
Back
Top