ogzogz
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately, the new application has problems. And this application works on a restrictive basis. Users will understand what I mean later. In the future, you might have to pay for the application, or it might not support your existing camera, etc. Therefore, this kind of application, presented as an improvement, isn't really an improvement at all.
Imagine needing three separate applications for a simple car camera. These are unfortunately minor inconveniences. I can't get the same enjoyment as before, because cameras are sold at twice the price they should be. The idea that more money equals quality is a very simplistic notion. There has never been a camera without problems. The company that updates most frequently is the one that makes the most mistakes. Errors are covered up with "improvements," pretending there are no errors, or acting as if they were already aware of them and will fix them later – nothing more than mocking people.
Will it improve, or will it continue down this path? We'll see.
Unfortunately, these are the harsh realities...
Imagine needing three separate applications for a simple car camera. These are unfortunately minor inconveniences. I can't get the same enjoyment as before, because cameras are sold at twice the price they should be. The idea that more money equals quality is a very simplistic notion. There has never been a camera without problems. The company that updates most frequently is the one that makes the most mistakes. Errors are covered up with "improvements," pretending there are no errors, or acting as if they were already aware of them and will fix them later – nothing more than mocking people.
Will it improve, or will it continue down this path? We'll see.
Unfortunately, these are the harsh realities...