GPak
Active Member
Sure, Mini 1 is the easiest to read.
In fact, it looks like zoom-in effect, i.e. objects are closer with narrower AOV.
We like 93° because we haven't seen 80° yet
I guess 80° or less AOV would be even better? so where do we stop?, there always should be some kind of balance/compromise.
In any case, I just hope for what you rightly pointed in your review, that manufacturers should honestly advertise actual dash cam AOV, and not a lens spec.
Until then, it would be nice if reviewers, along with the advertised AOV, could also include the actual AOV of different dash cams for a fair comparison.
In fact, it looks like zoom-in effect, i.e. objects are closer with narrower AOV.
We like 93° because we haven't seen 80° yet
I guess 80° or less AOV would be even better? so where do we stop?, there always should be some kind of balance/compromise.
In any case, I just hope for what you rightly pointed in your review, that manufacturers should honestly advertise actual dash cam AOV, and not a lens spec.
Until then, it would be nice if reviewers, along with the advertised AOV, could also include the actual AOV of different dash cams for a fair comparison.
Last edited: