Maybe if you actually read what was posted, instead of arguing for the sake of it; - I never said it was correct. I said you couldn't assume if someone stated Full HD it meant 1080P, because sometimes people were marketing / or misusing using the term Full HD for slightly higher resolutions as the term Quad HD is little used. You disagreed and were proven wrong with an advertisement marketing 1440P as Full HD, but still had to argue.
QUOTE="c4rc4m, post: 346140, member: 27729"] Ever thought you're maybe just narrow minded? You spent months arguing that Action Cameras
couldn't be used as Dashcams despite the fact that I'd used one daily for several years and until others eventually also jumped in to say they also used Action Cameras as well, because you just made the assumption that everyone has the same requirements as you. You never think that maybe some people put quality above features such as GPS and shock sensors, and that not everyone lives in a country where dash temperatures reach the mid hundreds, or leave cameras permanently mounted.
You also appear to be so narrow minded that you simply want nothing more in discussion than a comparison of Cam A to Cam B, without ever considering why a camera might not be as good as others, and never questioning if improvements can be made. That's fine, Cam A to B comparisons are useful and great, and a great part of what forums like this are about, but if that is the extent of discussion, cameras never get better. I believe in pushing manufacturers to improve their higher end product quality and trying to point out and discuss how improvements can be made from my amateur knowledge of cameras. That way, hopefully we all quickly get much improved cameras rather than slow progress. Sorry if that takes a few words.