Sorry, I read that wrong. And obviously I've never heard of that camera.Red have a range of cameras with 5 figure prices:
Sorry, I read that wrong. And obviously I've never heard of that camera.Red have a range of cameras with 5 figure prices:
I'm saying that 4K delivers a much better chance of reading license plates, whatever the bitrate as long as it is not less.
I agree with what Nigel says. I have 1080p dashcam as well as the 4k and have had better results at results with the 4k. Personally I don’t mind at all the extra sized files.I still find this statement hard to swallow though, for the same reasons mentioned above. Does anyone else care to chime in?
I agree with what Nigel says. I have 1080p dashcam as well as the 4k and have had better results at results...
You can manually shut off the dash camera for when your parked in a secure area.Sorry to hear buffered parking mode still isn't quite working as you'd expect.
Not too upsetting for me though, as I mostly wanted a dashcam for driving.
I've tried the low-bitrate pseduo-parking-mode, but found it unsatisfactory. 12+ hours of footage of the inside of my garage - longer if I've taken the motorcycle to work - isn't very useful.
Here is a frame grab from the A129 Pro 4K low bitrate parking mode which was recording at 3832 Kbps, same bitrate as the A129 Duo records low bitrate parking mode at. I've resized it down to 1080 and overlaid that in the top right.Are the resulting file sizes per each minute of recording exactly the same on each dashcam? Or are the files much larger on the the 4K camera? Because that is what we are talking about -- not simply if the 4K dashcam can record higher quality video.
It's obvious that a 4K camera will record in better quality at higher bitrate outputs. But Nigel said it will also record in better quality at the same exact bitrate output as 1080p cameras. I think not.
Update: Since you edited your comment after I responded, it's clear that you are simply stating an opinion irregardless of resulting file size.
Here is a frame grab from the A129 Pro 4K low bitrate parking mode which was recording at 3832 Kbps, same bitrate as the A129 Duo records low bitrate parking mode at. I've resized it down to 1080 and overlaid that in the top right.
The occupants were shorter than average, one would have had to stand on toe tips to see over the roof!Did anyone notice the rear head rests in the white fiesta! They are at full extension, pretty much touching the roof!
Is there any advantage to using the newer mount for the a129 versus the older mount? if not, is there any advantage of using the mount power connection vs the dash cam power connection? Thanks for any info on this.
The newer mounts support the 3rd wire from the 3-wire hardwire kit. Keep in mind that the camera has to also support it. If you always power directly into the camera, then there is no difference.Since nobody has offered any advice, I think the best thing to do is to start a new thread, so I will. I am sure there are many other users who have a similar question.
Unfortunately, if customers go to Viofo's website, they will see absolutely nothing dealing with the change of GPS mounts. This is rather pathetic but fits the "type of support" you get from Viofo!
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
M | Best parking mode | A129 / 129 Duo | 2 | |
D | Question on Buffered Parking Mode | A129 / 129 Duo | 8 | |
J | Buffered parking mode not working? | A129 / 129 Duo | 6 | |
How to connect A129 to Cellink Neo 9 for Buffered Parking Mode | A129 / 129 Duo | 43 | ||
Buffered parking mode coming soon to the A129? | A129 / 129 Duo | 49 |