It is true that 60 FPS can mean a sharper image, in the sense that when using that you can also not go to a slower exposure than 1:60 second, and that is 2 X faster exposure than what a 30 FPS camera will do minimum.
Either way, the situations / times of day that particular setting are better than 30 FPS are marginal, at least that is what i found testing 2 similar cameras side by side for a few months.
From a photo technical standpoint and capturing something that is moving fast, the exposure should not be under 1:500 second or was it 1:250 second
![Unsure :unsure: :unsure:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f914.png)
,,,,,, at least that is what i was told in photo class in school.
And TBH i think the teacher here meant humanly fast, not automotive or rocket fast.
The pics you see of Hasmilton zipping thru a turn at 260 km/h, probably taken with a substantially faster exposure,,,,, there is a reason cameras go up to insane fast exposure times.