Reviewing and Testing the 3-ch Viofo A329T

Looking at the two cars as well as the concrete curb and the grey part of the trailer, it looks like (at least in this setting) the HDR process for the rear camera introduces a mild level of digital artifacts that are much less evident in the images from the front cameras that I posted above. Overall, these are pretty clean images - remember we're zoomed at 200% for the two images directly above.
The HDR-ON image shows more texture detail, whereas the HDR-OFF image is smoother with less noise, but also lacks fine detail
 
The HDR-ON image shows more texture detail, whereas the HDR-OFF image is smoother with less noise, but also lacks fine detail
This is especially visible in the tall, skinny Arborvitae tree in the center of the image: With HDR off, it appears smooth in texture, whereas with HDR on, you can see surface texture. The differences in detail are also reflected in the respective file sizes.
 
Here is a start at a data rate table - I'll update this as I gather more data. I'm seeing data rates commensurate with that others have already reported in other threads. I still need to play around with different parking modes. More to come.

A329 Data Rates.webp
 
Last edited:
The other day, I posted some static images (no movement) from the A329T camera. That was pretty impressive, but only part of the story. Today, I made some additional footage and made some screen shots of individual frames from the MP4 files. I used CapCut to examine the video file, zoom in, and make screen grabs.

The overall scene is that I'm sitting in a turn lane with a red light and traffic is moving past in the lanes to my right at 35-40mph. Here is the overall scene from the 4k main camera, grabbed from VLC player. As you can see in the stamps at the bottom of the frame, HDR is enabled for both the front and telephoto cameras (I forgot to turn it off after making the comparisons that I posted previously - doh!).
A329F Ambulance Full Frame.webp


Then I used CapCut to advance, frame by frame, until the back left wheel of the ambulance was aligned with the second white stripe from the crosswalk (I don't have this same granularity with VLC, so the image above doesn't quite show the ambulance wheels on the second line of the crosswalk). With CapCut, I zoomed in to 250% and focused on just the license plate. The resulting image is a little fuzzy, but clearly readable:
A329F Ambulance Place 250p.webp


Then, I advanced the video by 5 frames (ambulance is now further away) to have another look. The image is a pinch smaller, but even more easily readable. I presume the additional clarity is derived from less right-to-left movement on a frame-to-frame basis as the ambulance moves further away from my stationary car. Impressive that the plate rendering got CLEANER with increased distance from my car, even though the image area itself is SMALLER... Very nice. I should probably repeat this set of images and zooms with HDR turned off and see how that impacts the clarity of the resulting images. That would be an interesting comparison and provide some additional insights about using HDR (or not) during the day with moving targets.
A329F Ambulance Place 250p 5 frames later.webp


The plate grabs above were going by at about 35-40 mph. I also zoomed in (250 percent) on two other areas in the frame that were stationary for a closer look. The first is the electronic sign at the gas station. The Sunoco logo at the top is very clean and clear, as are the illuminated numbers for the price of gas.
A329F Gas Station 250p.webp


Then I zoomed in (300 percent) on another sign on the left side of the road (directly in the center of the whole image I posted above) that was a bit further away along with an approaching car. Due to the greater distance, this sign and the approaching car are not quite so clean. This is perhaps beyond reasonable expectations to get a clean rendering, even from a 4k camera, due the the distance involved. The overall rendering of the sign, however, is pretty good - there is some ghosting along the perimeter of the sign and the outline of the adjacent roof in the left side of the image.
A329F Approaching Car 300p.webp


I then compared the footage from the 4k main camera (above) to that of the 2k 4x telephoto front camera (below). Here is the entire frame as captured from VLC Player:
A329T Ambulance Entire Frame.webp


Because the telephoto lens was not able to see the crosswalk in the previous image, I instead advanced to the frame where the rear wheels of the ambulance were all of the way through the intersection, and then zoomed in (by 250 percent) again on the license plate. As expected, I found a nice, clear rending of a moving license plate from much farther away:
A329T Ambulance Plate 250p.webp


Interestingly, the ambulance plate remained quite readable even after the ambulance was well past the intersection. Here is a 100% zoom/crop of the point at which the plate starts to become harder to read with the telephoto camera. Two or three more frames more renders the plate unreadable. That's a pretty good distance at a 35-40 mph speed differential!
A329T Ambulance Past Intersection 100p.webp


The telephoto lens was also unable to capture the gas station sign for a direct comparison (the telephoto factor placed it outside of the frame), so I zoomed in (also 250 percent) on the same road sign as above that is further away. This zoom, too, exhibits great clarity as I expected (this is a static image - my car is not moving). This is a pretty impressive image when compared to the very first image in this post that comes from the main camera.
A329T Ambulance Sign 250p.webp


Overall, this is pretty impressive plate capture given the 35-40 speed differential my of stationary car with the traffic passing by on the right. Still images are equally impressive.

In another few days, my plan is to post some screen grabs from the highway where both cars (mine and target car) will be in motion. I will also make sure that HDR is returned to "timer" mode so it off during the day instead of just being set to "on." I also want to post some screen captures from the extensive set of menus in the A329T. It's quite a lot to learn 😉
 
Last edited:
Do you have your telephoto aimed directly ahead, or slightly to one side (driver or passenger)? Due to the narrow FOV it can be difficult to find a good mounting position that is not affected by the windshield curvature.

I installed my A329T telephoto this morning. I had intended placing it on the driver's side of the frit around the rear view mirror, so that it would be aimed slightly towards oncoming traffic. However the glass curvature meant that it was aimed further across the road than I wanted, so instead I chose a central position under the rear view mirror, and also out of sight of the main camera.
 
Out of curiosity, how many minutes of loop recording do you set in the settings? Is 1 minute enough or should I increase it? Thanks.
 
Out of curiosity, how many minutes of loop recording do you set in the settings? Is 1 minute enough or should I increase it? Thanks.
For these high-resolution high-bitrate cameras, my personal preference is 1 minute. If I have to provide the original video file to police or insurers, I don't want the file to be any larger than necessary. I can always send two files if needed.

A 1-minute 400MB file is quicker to upload and share than a 3-minute 1.2GB file.
 
Do you have your telephoto aimed directly ahead, or slightly to one side (driver or passenger)? Due to the narrow FOV it can be difficult to find a good mounting position that is not affected by the windshield curvature.
This is exactly the issue I'm having with mounting. My car has a huge driver support system behind the rear view mirror, so this entire area is not usable. I have a Viofo A139Pro just below the mirror, slightly off to the right side of the car so it is hidden from my point of view in the driver's seat. The telephoto camera for the A329 sits directly to the left of this and with the curvature of the windshield, it aims a bit to the left. The wedge shape of the A329T camera means that it hangs down below the mirror a bit too much for my liking, so it's up behind the driver's sun visor as close to center as I can get it. But with the curvature of the windshield here, too, I need to tilt it at an awkward angle in order to restore a level horizon. As a result, both of the images from the A329 are skewed a bit to the left. If have two more cameras behind the passenger side sun visor on the right hand side of the car and they are skewed a bit to the right.

Out of curiosity, how many minutes of loop recording do you set in the settings? Is 1 minute enough or should I increase it? Thanks.
I've been running 3min files, but given the larger size of files over time, I'm inclined to make the switch to 1min files for the reasons Tony mentions.
 
Here is the obstacle that I have to dodge while trying to place a camera: It's no big deal if you don't try to install multiple cameras 😉
Intellisafe Module.webp
 
For these high-resolution high-bitrate cameras, my personal preference is 1 minute. If I have to provide the original video file to police or insurers, I don't want the file to be any larger than necessary. I can always send two files if needed.

A 1-minute 400MB file is quicker to upload and share than a 3-minute 1.2GB file.
Oh thanks, great points. I saw you have a polarizing filter on the rear camera, to buy separately. Do you think it's necessary?
 
I haven't yet made a direct with and without a rear polarizer filter to post the differences, but adding a polarizer is definitely a worthwhile addition. I have some images from my A139 Pro rear camera after adding a polarizer posted here:

 
Oh thanks, great points. I saw you have a polarizing filter on the rear camera, to buy separately. Do you think it's necessary?
I've not installed the rear camera yet, so I can't say for sure. But I like having a CPL on the rear to see through reflections on other cars' windscreens.
 
Here is the obstacle that I have to dodge while trying to place a camera: It's no big deal if you don't try to install multiple cameras 😉
View attachment 85256
My current installation:
A329S and Mobius SLL1 on driver's side of the mirror. Telephoto mounted centrally under the mirror housing. Actually, I flipped it around 180deg horizontally after taking this so the mount foot is on the driver's side - the slight change in curvature means the camera is aimed slightly towards the middle of the road rather than towards the edge.
PXL_20250917_115846278~2.webp
 
That's a nice and clean install and works best when the cameras are of similar shape. I've got an A329T on the drivers side, with the telephoto directly under the mirror housing. Next to the telephoto is my A139P (both are off-center, in opposite directions). On my passenger side, I've got an N5S and an N4S side by side, which takes up the entire top area on the passenger-side front window. None of them are ideally placed because my mirror housing is twice as wide as yours, so I'm definitely running into window curvature issues.
 
Last edited:
My current installation:
A329S and Mobius SLL1 on driver's side of the mirror. Telephoto mounted centrally under the mirror housing. Actually, I flipped it around 180deg horizontally after taking this so the mount foot is on the driver's side - the slight change in curvature means the camera is aimed slightly towards the middle of the road rather than towards the edge.
View attachment 85266
What does it look like with the main Viofo camera in that position? Can you still see the entire front of the car, or is a large chunk cut off?
 
What does it look like with the main Viofo camera in that position? Can you still see the entire front of the car, or is a large chunk cut off?
The A329T has a clear view ahead - no obstructions. The telephoto camera is barely visible on the lower left edge of the A329T video, but it doesn't affect the view outside the car.

The Mobius view is partially blocked by the mirror housing but I'm OK with that - I have it installed to capture license plates on the other side.
 
When Jessica at Viofo sent the camera for review, she was kind enough to include the BTR200 Bluetooth Remote Control button. This is the same remote control that works with other Viofo cameras. Here is a closeup of the buttons on the remote. In the closeup, you can see an LED above the triangle on the main button that indicates the remote is transmitting a command to the camera.

The back of the button (where the VHB is already installed) slides sideways to open the battery component so you can change the battery.
IMG_17075.webp


But the best part is that the two side buttons are PROGRAMMABLE! I attached the manual to this post so you can peruse some of the details on you own.

The button on the left with the circle on it is the "Action" button. The button on the right with the microphone on it is the "Mic" button. After pairing the remote with the camera, you can choose what happens when you press either the Action button or the Mic button. The app menu shows you what the initial settings are and both buttons can be reassigned.

Bluetooth Button Function.webp


First up are the choices in the app for what happens when you press the Action button (circle):
Settings for Action Button.webp


Followed by the choices in the app for what happens when you press the Mic button:
Settings for Mic Button.webp


Obviously, I need to play around more, but I'm thinking my initial custom settings for this super cool remote control will be for toggling Parking Mode and Power Off for the camera. More on this later... First, I need to find a good place to mount the button.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Another interesting feature allows you to control the front telephoto camera is turned on or off. The setting that makes the most sense for me is to have the telephoto camera enabled only while driving (your ideal settings are likely to be different). This will save battery power and memory card space while my car is parked at work. And true to form, when the front camera is turned off, the soft glow of the power LED it also disabled. This is a nice element of visual feedback.

Telephoto Camera Setting.webp
 
Last edited:
The button is nice!
I set the circle button to enable or disable the Wifi.
Much nicer to have a short press on the remote than having to reach up and long press.
 
Yeah, I suspect I'll have to play around for a little while before I settle on which functionality I want to retain for the long-run. I also need to pick a good mounting location on my dash.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top