What you said it's an assumption. How do you know it's not the camera that has bad@undersized regulators and/or controllers?
I observe that you are on this forum something like a God which is showing to the people how wrong are they in everything they say. No matter what a user is saying you are against his ideas. You have no school or graduation or at least
experience in any domain of dashcam world, to sustain your fights.
I am here from 9 years and I
never saw such behavior from
any user. Some came here and doing things like you are doing here in latest three months, but after they observed that this forum is a nice forum, they quit in some way. Quit the forum or start respecting other users. You even fighted against the greatest user of this forum with the biggest dashcam experience in the
world showing him how wrong is he and how right are you. This only a God can do. Or a
troll.
But God will never insulte the amazing knowledge of jokiin and his kindness and helping people from here no matter if they bought his dashcam ot not. He was so kind on the last fight with you that he didn't told you that his company is offering for
free the DashCam Player after you accused the manufacturers are not offering for free such player. He could demonstrate to you that he is different and his company is offering the thing you asked. But I think he avoided that just to not draw your attention to his products and start
trolling his products too like you are doing with Viofo.
Also not forget that you declared how great is the ADAS on 70Mai, a feature which is 101% useless and because is useless serious manufacturers are not including it on the camera options. But only if Viofo offered ADAS could be a disaster implementation. If is made by 70Mai is fantastic and helping you in your daily driving. And you declared this even you don't have the 70mai but only for few days and the result was fantastic after your big and great experience of 3 days with 70Mai.
If you are not respecting a product or a brand it is your choice. In almost every post, you are against a camera which you don't have, but also on a camera you have. Just read your latest two posts from here. A camera which is declared maybe the best in the world
all around great camera by
@DashCamMan , have
bad electronics inside, have a
sinistre HDR implementation, you are pretending to V3 to have declared horizontal FOV even
ALL dashcams manufacturers in the world are declaring
diagonal FOV and you repeated this many many times. No dashcam manufacturer is declaring horizontal FOV but you want only Viofo to declare it and if not declare like you want they are cheaters.
You should ask site administrator to allow comments on his camera reviews so you can post there how bad are the cameras he is declaring that are great. You can post the same bad review to any Viofo product because it share the
same lens,
same CMOS, almost
same firmware as you said. More than that, you can post bad reviews to any dashcam which is using same CMOS or same chipset as Viofo because Novatek is implementing the HDR, so all dashcams made with Novatek and Sony are
sinistre. Do not forget how desperate you were to obtain the A129 Plus HDR firmware and after you obtained it from Viofo because they were good boys and gave to you, you just started the HDR hate against Viofo, even it is impossible the HDR to work like you expect because the cars are moving. Moving cars = different recorded frames. More speed = more distance between frames = more ghosting. The idea of HDR is for photography because are static, not for videos. Can be for videos but with with much bigger costs. A camera with a HDR like you expect can cost $2000 and you can not afford such dashcam, you bought something cheap.
If a user is reading Dashcamtalk reviews and then will read your opinions about that products the results can be two: reviews are fake and telling to people to buy poor cameras or you are a
troll.