An article that should be filed with the conspiracy theories, nothing but speculation and rubish science!
It's classic! These are some of the world's preeminent virologists, epidemiologists, physicians, bench scientists, data scientists, scholars and experts in fields of public health and public policy but YOU, a random guy on the internet who spends most of his waking hours, 7 days a week posting to a dash cam forum where you try desperately to present yourself as a world class expert on literally every subject, somehow feels superior enough to dismiss these experts who have lifetimes of high level education, knowledge, research and hands-on experience as indulging in "rubbish science". Why is it that every time YOU are challenged to explain what credentials you claim for your alleged expertise in these matters you are completely silent?
There is a word for the kind pathology where ignorant people arrogantly present themselves as superior to literally everyone else regardless of their merit, and no doubt a psychology professional would have a field day with you. It is remarkable how often we witness this sort of thing from you. It has certainly been on display since the very beginning of this thread and indeed throughout the whole forum. It is sad really, but also potentially destructive. It's the same dangerous, provocative nonsense we see with charlatans like Ivor Cummins who represents the epitome of self serving rubbish science, ignorance and conspiracy theory and which you seem to find sympathy with. But hey, it's the internet. Little people can make believe they are someone other than who they are and try to get others to go along with it.
I would invite anyone reading this to click on and read the full profiles of anyone on the team that wrote the article in Foreign Affairs Magazine and consider the absurdity of someone like our friend Nigel's dismissive and condescending attitude towards these people and their work.
pandefense.com
One might also consider the caliber of the publication
Foreign Affairs Magazine and what it takes for them to publish an article of this nature. They feature some of the most prominent individuals on the planet, they don't suffer fools and they certainly don't indulge in conspiracy theories or "rubbish science".
You can start with Larry Brilliant's profile. Nigel thinks he knows more about pandemics and epidemiology than this guy!