Reviewing and Testing the Vantrue N4 Pro S

No problem we all learn from this. Dashcam's force you to learn a new kind of language.

My brain is overly wired for dashcam thinking - I was driving and noticed terrible speaker reflections in my windshield and my first instinct was to try to adjust the Dashcan CPL Filter 😳

Unavoidable but able to be reduced by using CPL FIlter. Only "Fix" is to put a non reflective pad on the dash.
 
Here is a comparison across three cameras that are presently in my car. I was moving about 35mph in this freeze frame. I chose the frame where the one-way signs aligns most closely with the corner of the red KFC building to help make sure I was equi-distant in each video. This is not quite an "apples to apples" comparison because the A139 Pro only has HDR, the two Vantrue cameras have both HDR and PlatePix turned on. A more direct comparison would likely be turning PlatePix off for each camera.

Also of note: all three cameras are 4K.

N4 Pro S HDR on PlatePix on:
N4PS KFC Scene.webp



S1 Pro Max HDR on PlatePix on: I think exposure is set to EV = +0.3 (I should double check this)
S1PM KFC Scene.webp



Viofo A139 Pro HDR on:
N4PS KFC Scene.webp


And then I did 300% zooms on the KFC billboard. I went forward and backward a few frames to see if any one frame was sharper than the adjacent ones, but they pretty much all looked the same to me within the same video.

N4 Pro S: Softest of the images, no ghosting around the billboard outline, black lettering at the bottom almost readable.
N4PS KFC Crop HDR on PP on.webp


S1 Pro Max: most contrast, most significant white ghosting around the billboard outline, black lettering at the bottom a bit easier to read, but tending toward becoming blobs.
S1PM KFC Crop HDR on PP on.webp


A139 Pro: brightest of the images, mild white ghosting around the right side outline of the sign, black lettering at bottom least blob-like and easiest to read.
A139P KFC Crop HDR on.webp
 
Last edited:
Here is another scene where I am stationary in a turn lane and traffic is passing by on the right at 35-40MPH. Here is the original scene - I chose this one because of the nice black Corvette Stingray with side exhaust pipes going by.

This is really the only way that I can capture license plates as Pennsylvania only requires a rear plate, so I can't grab plates from oncoming traffic. Plus doing this, I can play with the video and determine (roughly) the distance at which the rear plate transitions from "readable" to "not readable" by looking earlier and later in the video feed while I'm sitting stationary at the light. In most cases, it's really just a matter of a few frames to move from readable to not not readable..

Stingray.webp


The following three images are 300% zooms of the black Stingray in the adjacent lane. All three images are advanced to nearly the very same frame for the best comparison - the back line representing the seam in the concrete roadway is aligned with the right hand side of the rear bumper. All three images result in a readable license plate.

N4 Pro S HDR on PlatePix on. This looks like the cleanest image overall.
Stingray N4PS.webp


S1 Pro Max HDR on PlatePix on. HDR and compression artifacts are most evident in the outline of the shadow of the car on the road and the vehicles at the car dealership in the background.
Stingray S1PM.webp


A139 Pro HDR on. This image shows the most flare from the sun in the wheels, the left bumper chrome, and more ghosting in the outline of the cars in the background.
Stingray A139P.webp
 
Last edited:
It's surprising to see so much difference reading the KFC Billboard between S1 Pro Max and N4 S Pro. Both cameras have PlatePix and are 4K.
 
I'm thinking I'll turn off PlatePix and make another daytime comparison, then do the same with HDR. I should also turn off HDR and PlatePix and compare those as well. It's clear that these three cameras are all performing at a pretty high level, I'm nit picking on details. You should have seen how much research I did when selecting a DSLR camera... 😉
 
I turned off HDR and PlatePix on both the S1 Pro Max and N4 Pro S to see how they do at night and to analyze which images I feel are best.
 
...You should have seen how much research I did when selecting a DSLR camera...
Don't keep us in suspense - what did you get? 😉
 
It was long ago, but I ended up with a full frame Canon 6D that still makes awesome images. I ended up renting and borrowing several bodies along the way to play with them. The focusing system isn’t as fast as today’s stuff, but I don’t need that now that the kids are older and don’t play sports any more.
 
It's strange that the new N4ROS doesn't have the upper hand, and the A139Pro is much worse than the A229Pro. In fact, HDR can be turned off during the day.
 
This next set of posts contains another series of images with various camera settings across three 4k cameras.

This first series is with a Vantrue N4PS, Vantrue S1 Pro Max, and Viofo A139 Pro. All image processing is turned off: No HDR, No PlatePix, only a circular polarizer is installed on each camera. Exposure was adjusted to EV = 0.0 for each camera. I was trying to make this as even as possible with "default" settings out of the box. I was sitting at a traffic light waiting for a left turn and the traffic in the adjacent lane was moving at about 35MPH. I aligned the shadow from the rear of the car with the seam in the concrete roadway, so this comparison is very precisely the exact same frame and distance from my car across each of the three cameras. The car that is passing by has a North Carolina plate, which is red letters on a mostly white background. I have three sets of comparison images for three camera, so here we go.

Full frame image from the N4 Pro S: No HDR, No PlatePix
Lexus Full N4PS.webp


Full frame image from the S1 Pro Max: No HDR, No PlatePix
Lexus Full S1PM.webp


Full frame image from the A139 Pro: No HDR
Lexus Full A139P.webp



Then I did a 200% crop of the rear of the car that contains the license plate. Again, I advanced each video to the very same frame - the shadow is just past the concrete seam on the road. This seemed to be close to the inflection point between where the plate was clearly readable and where it began transitioning to noticeably less readable. The rear plate is largely readable from each camera.

200% crop from the N4 Pro S: No HDR, No PlatePix
Lexus 200z N4PS.webp


200% crop from the S1 Pro Max: No HDR, No PlatePix
Lexus 200z S1PM.webp


200% crop from the A139 Pro: No HDR
Lexus 200z A139P.webp


And, just to make things interesting, I advanced each of the 200% crops above by 10 frames (about 1/3 of a second) and then made 300% crops of just the rear plate to see what happens. It looks like the N4PS and the A139P are a pinch easier to read than the S1PM, but they are pretty close. The actual plate is "XVC 6925" - here are those results:

300% crop N4 Pro S: No HDR, No PlatePix
10 Frames Later N4PS.webp


300% crop S1 Pro Max: No HDR, No PlatePix
10 Frames Later S1PM.webp


300% crop A139 Pro: No HDR
10 Frames Later A139P.webp
 
Last edited:
A139 Pro appears to do better in this test. It's often a tradeoff due to contrast and lightening conditions where one camera shines over another in a given test.
 
The internal camera image sensor of a139Pro is imx291, a229Pro is imx307, n4ROS is imx662, and the internal camera n4ROS should be the clearest。
 
This second series is with a Vantrue N4Pro S, Vantrue S1 Pro Max, and Viofo A139 Pro. HDR image processing is turned ON for each of the three cameras and a circular polarizer is installed on each camera. Exposure was adjusted to EV = 0.0 for each camera. I was sitting at a traffic light waiting for a left turn and the traffic in the adjacent lane was moving at about 35MPH. Like the set above I aligned the shadow from the rear of the car with the seam in the concrete roadway, so this comparison is very precisely the exact same frame and distance from my car across each of the three cameras. This time, the car that is passing by has a Pennsylvania license plate, which has blue letters on a mostly white background. This plate is covered by a smoke-colored plastic license plate cover which is picking up a little bit of sun glare.

With the full frame image, the two Vantrue cameras have more saturated colors. The S1 Pro Max has the darkest image of the three with HDR enabled.

Full frame image from the N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep Full N4PS.webp




Full frame image from the S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep Full S1PM.webp




Full frame image from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
Jeep Full A139P.webp



Then I did a 200% crop of the rear of the car that contains the license plate. Again, I advanced each video to the very same frame - the shadow is just past the concrete seam on the road. The rear plate is largely readable from each camera. The darkness of the S1 Pro Max makes the plate hardest to read and the brightness of the A139 Pro makes it easiest to read.

200% crop from the N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep 200z N4PS.webp


200% crop from the S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep 200z S1PM.webp



200% crop from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
Jeep 200z A139P.webp



And, like before, I advanced each of the 200% crops above by 10 frames (about 1/3 of a second) and then made 300% crops of just the rear plate to see what happens. It looks like the A139 Pro is the easiest to read (though, it's not great - I can read the four digits at the end, but not the three letters at the start), and the two Vantrue images are not as readable. The actual plate is "KXS 9986" - here are the results:

300% crop N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep Plate 300z N4PS.webp


300% crop S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
Jeep Plate 300z S1PM.webp


300% crop A139 Pro: HDR ON
Jeep Plate 300z A139P.webp


Next up are comparisons with PlatePix enabled on the Vantrue cameras.
 
Last edited:
The internal camera image sensor of a139Pro is imx291, a229Pro is imx307, n4ROS is imx662, and the internal camera n4ROS should be the clearest。

I am not sure this is a correct statement - all three products are listed as using the very same 4k IMX678 sensor.

Viofo's webpage indicates the A139 Pro uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678:

The Viofo A229 Pro uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678

And the Vantrue webpage indicates the N4 Pro S also uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678
 
This second series is with a Vantrue N4Pro S, Vantrue S1 Pro Max, and Viofo A139 Pro. HDR image processing is turned ON for each of the three cameras and a circular polarizer is installed on each camera. Exposure was adjusted to EV = 0.0 for each camera. I was sitting at a traffic light waiting for a left turn and the traffic in the adjacent lane was moving at about 35MPH. Like the set above I aligned the shadow from the rear of the car with the seam in the concrete roadway, so this comparison is very precisely the exact same frame and distance from my car across each of the three cameras. This time, the car that is passing by has a Pennsylvania license plate, which has blue letters on a mostly white background. This plate is covered by a smoke-colored plastic license plate cover which is picking up a little bit of sun glare.

With the full frame image, the two Vantrue cameras have more saturated colors. The S1 Pro Max has the darkest image of the three with HDR enabled.

Full frame image from the N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83108



Full frame image from the S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83109



Full frame image from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
View attachment 83110


Then I did a 200% crop of the rear of the car that contains the license plate. Again, I advanced each video to the very same frame - the shadow is just past the concrete seam on the road. The rear plate is largely readable from each camera. The darkness of the S1 Pro Max makes the plate hardest to read and the brightness of the A139 Pro makes it easiest to read.

200% crop from the N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83111

200% crop from the S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83112


200% crop from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
View attachment 83113


And, like before, I advanced each of the 200% crops above by 10 frames (about 1/3 of a second) and then made 300% crops of just the rear plate to see what happens. It looks like the A139 Pro is the easiest to read (though, it's not great - I can read the four digits at the end, but not the three letters at the start), and the two Vantrue images are not as readable. The actual plate is "KXS 9986" - here are the results:

300% crop N4 Pro S: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83114

300% crop S1 Pro Max: HDR ON, No PlatePix
View attachment 83115

300% crop A139 Pro: HDR ON
View attachment 83116

Next up are comparisons with PlatePix enabled on the Vantrue cameras.

I think the Viofo wins this test. You'd need the Telescopic lens of the A329 to perfectly read the plate. However, the Viofo gives the best image. It looks like K(?)S 9986
 
This is the third series with a Vantrue N4Pro S, Vantrue S1 Pro Max, and Viofo A139 Pro. The individual camera settings are as follows:

Viofo A139 Pro: HDR is on
Vantrue N4 Pro S: HDR of OFF, PlatePix is ON
Vantrue S1 Pro Max: HDR is OFF, PlatePix is ON

Each of the three cameras has a circular polarizer installed. Exposure was adjusted to EV = 0.0 for each camera. I was sitting at a traffic light waiting for a left turn and the traffic in the adjacent lane was moving at about 35-40MPH. Like the two sets above I aligned the shadow from the rear of the car with the seam in the concrete roadway, so this comparison is very precisely the exact same frame and distance from my car across each of the three cameras. This time, the car that is passing by has a Pennsylvania license plate, which has blue letters on a mostly white background. There is no plastic license plate cover like in the image set above.

With the full frame image, the two Vantrue cameras have more saturated colors. The S1 Pro Max has the darkest image of the three with PlatePix enabled.

Full frame image from the N4 Pro S: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Ram Overall Scene N4PS.webp



Full frame image from the S1 Pro Max: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Rame Overall Scene S1PM.webp



Full frame image from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
Ram Overal Scene A139P.webp


Then I did a 200% crop of the rear of the truck that contains the license plate. Again, I advanced each video to the very same frame - the shadow is just past the concrete seam on the road. The rear plate is largely readable from each camera. The S1 Pro Max again produces the darkest image with the greatest amount of contrast on the plate, making it the easiest to read (by a pinch), followed by the N4 Pro S (which is also excellent), and the Viofo again produces the brightest images of the three, but the HDR setting appears to have created some ghosting on the left and right sides of the plate (which is still readable).

200% crop from the N4 Pro S: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Ram 200z N4PS.webp



200% crop from the S1 Pro Max: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Ram 200z S1PM.webp



200% crop from the A139 Pro: HDR ON
Ram 200z A139P.webp



And, like before, I advanced each of the 200% crops above by 5 frames (10 frames was too much - no plate was discernible, so I'm assuming the truck was moving faster than the traffic in my previous two image sets) and then made 300% crops of just the rear plate to see what happens. All three plates below are fairly difficult to read. The lettering on the A139 Pro seems most fuzzy, but also a pinch easier to read (though not by much). The S1 Pro Max seems to blend the letters with the blue stripe above them more than the N4 Pro S does. The actual plate is "PA-WILDS" - here are the results:

300% crop N4 Pro S: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Ram 300z N4PS.webp


300% crop S1 Pro Max: HDR OFF, PlatePix is ON
Ram 300z S1PM.webp


300% crop A139 Pro: HDR ON
Ram 300z A139P.webp


Overall, these are VERY close results and it's difficult to call any one of them a consistent and clear winner. It really seems to depend on exactly what the circumstances are. All three cameras use the very same IMX678 4k sensor.

At some point, I'll attempt to make some night time comparisons. It's a surprising amount of work to make sure the cameras are all set exactly the way you want (I goofed this a time or two), and I had to make a few loops in the road until I was the lead car at the light and sat long enough for others to go by before my turn arrow turned green. Then making all of the captures and keeping them from getting mixed up. Sounds simple until you start doing it - it's really easy to mix things up.
 
Last edited:
Here are some comparisons of the rear images from the Vantrue N4 Pro S, Vantrue S1 Pro Max, and the Viofo A139 Pro cameras.

The Viofo and the S1 Pro Max rear cameras both have a rear polarizer fitted. The polarizer is the Viofo CPL-300 which is a flat, rectangular plate that sticks on with some adhesive pads. The N4 Pro S rear camera is naked and shows more reflections than the other two do. The sun in streaming directly in the rear window, so this is a "worst case" scenario for direct light.

Vantrue N4 Pro S - 2.5k camera, HDR is on, no polarizer:
Parking Lot Rear N4 Pro S.webp


Vantrue S1 Pro Max - 4k camera, HDR is on, Viofo polarizer installed:
Parking Lot Rear S1PM.webp


Viofo A139 - 1k camera, no HDR, Viofo polarizer installed:
Parking Lot Rear A139P.webp


@Jeff_Vantrue: sorry for mounting a 3rd party polarizer on your rear camera, but it makes a very nice improvement! It would be GREAT if Vantrue had a polarizer that was dedicated to your rear cameras!

Here are the 200% zooms from each of the rear camera screen captures above. That 4K rear camera on the S1 Pro Max is a clear standout winner! The image quality is even better when mounted on the OUTSIDE of the car, but then the polarizer can't be installed...

N4 Pro S Rear image, 2.5k resolution, 200% zoom, HDR on: without a polarizer, the rear dash reflection obscures any chance of reading this license plate.
Rear Zoom N4PS.webp


S1 Pro Max Rear Image, 4k resolution, 200% zoom, HDR on, 3rd party polarizer installed: it’s no surprise that the 4k camera renders the best image.
Rear Zoom S1PM.webp


Viofo A139 Pro Rear Image, 1k resolution, 200% zoom, no HDR, Viofo CPL-300 rear polarizer installed:
Rear Zoom A139P.webp
 
Last edited:
I am not sure this is a correct statement - all three products are listed as using the very same 4k IMX678 sensor.

Viofo's webpage indicates the A139 Pro uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678:

The Viofo A229 Pro uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678

And the Vantrue webpage indicates the N4 Pro S also uses Sony Starvix 2 IMX678
I mean the sensor of the internal camera, not the front camera:happy::happy:
 
Gotcha - I was confused with your posting. 😉 Sometimes I’m dense…
 
Last edited:
Back
Top