Reviewing and Testing the Vantrue S1 Pro Max

@EricSan

The main issue I see is the rear camera of the S1 Pro gets very dark in certain lighting. The Front camera of the S1 Pro Max isn't too bad under default settings.

dark.webp
 
The main issue I see is the rear camera of the S1 Pro gets very dark in certain lighting. The Front camera of the S1 Pro Max isn't too bad under default settings.
If you try this method, set your camera to 50% sky and 50% road and see if the exposure changes. Right now, the sky is 80%.
 
@EricSan

The main issue I see is the rear camera of the S1 Pro gets very dark in certain lighting. The Front camera of the S1 Pro Max isn't too bad under default settings.

View attachment 82627

Weird cause other cameras I have with similar views aren't that dark. I can lower the camera downward some, but I'm not sure how much it'll help. Others point out the S1 Pro Max footage is also dark.
 
I am seeing some situations where the S1PM rear camera looks overly contrasty, but it is not all of the time suggesting the HDR algorithm might need some tweaking. In addition, adjusting your camera down so the frame contains more dark dash and less bright sky as @gse suggests will also help.

@Jeff_Vantrue
What would be ideal is a setting for reduced vertical resolution, cropping about 200-300 lines from the top (useless bright sky) and bottom (useless back dash) of the image, focusing on the critical middle band that contains road traffic.
 
Moved rear camera downward. Vibration is still issue but we'll see how the lighting goes with it facing more the interior / trunk and less of the sky.
 
I remember, back in the day you had a choice in the metering of dashcams, or some at least.
I also have this on my 4K digital scope for the nighttime pew pew stick
 
Here is a still from last night's drive. It's about 9:45p, so the sun has set quite a while ago and it's dark. I am in the middle lane, moving at 75mph, passing a truck that is in the right lane.

Night Time Full Frame.webp


And here are the closeup images, zoomed 200% from each of the three cameras that are in my car. HDR is off and PlatePix is enabled on the two Vantrue cameras. Given past discussions, it is unclear whether PlatePix is functioning because HDR is off. None of these images are useful for identification. It might be interesting to repeat this with HDR enabled to see what happens.

Viofo A139 Pro:
Viofo A139 Pro Night Plate.webp


Vantrue N4S renders the best image, but still a clear miss.
Vantrue N4S Night Plate.webp


Vantrue S1 Pro Max:
Vantrue S1PM Night Plate.webp
 
Amazed you are not getting better results on a same direction target, and you not going hyper speed passing it. And even if there look to be no HDR in there just motion blur.
My experience with on oncoming cars and plate capture are also flaky with latest 70mai systems and E1 PRO

Even stranger some times on a oncoming plate, the botton 1/2 - 2/3 " i can see razor sharp in the image, or should i say it appear to be razor sharp CUZ that part of a plate dont really have any writing ASO on it, but the rest of it is not there, making me wonder how the hell the system manage to pull that off.
 
Yeah, I was surprised that none of the images were readable… the difference in speed couldn’t have been more than 5-7 mph. There was a car following the truck, so there were my lights, plus the lights of the other car.
 
Here is a still from last night's drive. It's about 9:45p, so the sun has set quite a while ago and it's dark. I am in the middle lane, moving at 75mph, passing a truck that is in the right lane.

View attachment 82657

And here are the closeup images, zoomed 200% from each of the three cameras that are in my car. HDR is off and PlatePix is enabled on the two Vantrue cameras. Given past discussions, it is unclear whether PlatePix is functioning because HDR is off. None of these images are useful for identification. It might be interesting to repeat this with HDR enabled to see what happens.

Viofo A139 Pro:
View attachment 82658

Vantrue N4S renders the best image, but still a clear miss.
View attachment 82659

Vantrue S1 Pro Max:
View attachment 82660

Sadly this is pretty typical of night shots I've looked at with the A139 Pro and other cameras at night. Lighting sucks and unless a vehicle is on top of you, it's pretty much game over on getting clear images.

Do make sure your windshield is clean, that might help a little if you haven't cleaned lately.
 
Last edited:
Vantrue suggested using a 3M Pad where you see the white line to lessen vibrations. I am going to test this suggestion and see if the road vibrations disappear.

View attachment 82670
That's a good idea if we don't need to use the rear hinge. I'll try that later this week.
 
@EricSan what startup times are you getting in quick start collision detection mode? I read in post #19 that you observed ~2s in quick start and ~10s in power saving mode.

I was doing some testing this morning with the LTE module and noticed the startup time was around 10-12 seconds. I checked - I have quick start enabled. I'm on FW version VT-EEF243.
 
@TonyM - we are both using the same firmware VT-EEF243. When I did my tests, I had both cameras connected (no LTE), waited for it to go to sleep, then flicked it with my finger. The wake up times were pretty consistent at just over 2s and about 10s. I wonder if the wake up times vary with and without LTE connected.
 
I'll also add that the S1PM collision detection sensor is VERY sensitive, even when turned down. It is more sensitive than the other Vantrue cameras and more sensitive than my Viofo camera.
 
It would be nice if it could use the anti-shake algorithm of sports cameras。

Arm extension isn't sturdy enough to deal with bumps. If you have a tight seal on the headliner, you could insert camera there. Otherwise, you will find it is wobbly while driving.
 
Vantrue suggested using a 3M Pad where you see the white line to lessen vibrations. I am going to test this suggestion and see if the road vibrations disappear.
Today I added a layer of VHB in the hinged mount as suggested by Vantrue. I did a before/after test run and can confirm that the vibrations were reduced, but not completely.

PXL_20250715_101012029.webp
PXL_20250715_101149464.webp


I think I can reduce the vibrations further with better management of the cable - adding more clips to hold it in place so that the cable does not pull on the camera.

I may add a before/after comparison video later if I have time....(TBC)
 
Today I added a layer of VHB in the hinged mount as suggested by Vantrue. I did a before/after test run and can confirm that the vibrations were reduced, but not completely.

View attachment 82702 View attachment 82701

I think I can reduce the vibrations further with better management of the cable - adding more clips to hold it in place so that the cable does not pull on the camera.

I may add a before/after comparison video later if I have time....(TBC)

I have yet to test this out.

Can you please post a rear video of how it looks in image #2
 
Today I added a layer of VHB in the hinged mount as suggested by Vantrue. I did a before/after test run and can confirm that the vibrations were reduced, but not completely.

View attachment 82702 View attachment 82701

I think I can reduce the vibrations further with better management of the cable - adding more clips to hold it in place so that the cable does not pull on the camera.

I may add a before/after comparison video later if I have time....(TBC)
What if you put a small piece of 3m tape from the camera to the plastic trim above it?
If the gap is too big just put 2 or 3 pieces on top of each other.
Just a thought I had.
 
Back
Top