I don't object to farming, but in the case of mink, all mink farms seem to be keep the mink in terrible conditions, otherwise it wouldn't be profitable, and mink are not creatures that like being stuck in tiny cages anyway, they are hunters.
"The country has taken a lighter-than-most approach to social distancing for COVID-19, relying on people to monitor themselves for symptoms, stay home when ill, practice good handwashing, and avoid crowds. You see very few masks on people's faces in current photos from Stockholm and other Swedish cities."
Over the whole epidemic, Sweden has 5 deaths for every one in Denmark (corrected for population), and they now have more immunity than Denmark so it should be easier to control any outbreaks. However they are currently on 19 deaths for every one in Denmark.
Asking someone to do something they might not want to do isn't going to get their compliance. They must be told what to do by means of laws which must be enforced well or you end up like here with everyone speeding because they know there's little chance of getting a ticket 
It seems to be over low public mask use and poor social distancing as restaurants, bars, etc. still have seating sections semi-closed to the 6ft (2m) rule and most retail and service employees you see now will be wearing a mask, with cashiers and clerks behind a clear plastic 'sneeze panel' 
As best I can tell, there have been no spikes yet due to protest crowds, but one church in Oregon which has not followed protection guidelines has been found to be the source of hundreds of cases (probably with hundreds more coming) being the main cause of the spike now being seen in that State 
My perspective is a bit different. It may be small town verses big city. Many people when asked went along with the requests. Once people were ordered they rebelled. Seeing the hypocricy of allowing big protests for BLM declaring them safe while being told Trump rallies are dangerous and will create viral epidemics only makes people angry. Either the virus is dangerous for everyone or it is not. The approach taken looks to many like it is about controlling people instead of controlling a virus. If the virus is so dangerous why is the governor doing a job of passing laws when that job is exclusively legislative?
The BLM protests where all outdoors with people maintaining some distance whenever possible and the biggest ones were in places with significant immunity. Result - little risk.
edition.cnn.com
The problem is that you went into lockdown too early and so have come out again with little immunity, your lockdown has gained you almost nothing. In Australia they have kept the lockdown until there is no virus left, so they are safe other than from external sources; in UK we built up enough immunity during lockdown to make future outbreaks unlikely and easy to wipe out, we don't need to worry even about external sources; your middle ground of leaving lockdown early with little immunity and poor testing/contact tracing is not going to work well! You do have 13 states with reasonable immunity, the rest still have a problem, plus there is Hawaii and Alaska which are isolated enough to not have problems as long as they never open their borders.The big city's county near me has seen a skyrocket-like spike in the last 3 weeks, which coincides perfectly with the opening of businesses again.
Kind of makes you want to re-think what your economy is based on and what effects it will have on you, which I see as a good thing- one should never stop thinking 
A slower more measured re-opening was clearly called for so as to maintain some control over this but we didn'tget that. Our Governor could have done better but apparently he lacks the 'cojones' to take a hard stand when needed unlike his predecessor- she had no 'cojones' but is much stronger than him 
That would be 
That needs a deep re-think too. Perhaps we will see that happen during and after the next round of elections but I'm not holding out much hope for that either. Lives have value and unlike money they can't be recouped later on if lost 
Locking down early means you needed to follow Australia and wait for zero virus before unlocking, but that wouldn't work given that you are not far from states with plenty of immunity who aren't going to bother getting to zero cases, New York, DC, etc. Now you have a choice of allowing more immunity to develop, or lock down with closed borders until a vaccine arrives, neither are good choices, but a compromise can be made.
Denmark and Germany are also low on immunity, You are about equal, so borders can be opened, but opening restaurants etc. is going to be a big problem, outdoor eating only until the vaccine arrives!
So no matter what a State does, it can only partially protect itself at best, as it's non-codified rules cannot be fully applied to non-residents passing through except in a declared emergency, and State laws seeking to exceed this level are illegal. It's a National problem which should (and could) be addressed properly but won't be because it involves too much hard thought, which Politicians are always short on having.
podcasts.google.com
www.dw.com
Oops, misjudged him again, apparently his plan isn't just imprisonment:
www.businessinsider.com
It would be interesting to know why Apple isn't prepared to use the UK's "accurate" distance measurement software in their "secure" system.