- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 740
- Reaction score
- 885
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Dash Cam
- Mobius
I believe the Mobius team are in a very lucky position compared to the competition. Tom Frank, from RC Groups, has made hundreds of test video clips from different cameras/lenses from an almost ideal location - his home. Compared to Tom, my share has been minute. I don't have such perfect conditions and my time is also limited. We usually make true comparisons, using two or more cameras recording the same scene from the same location. Not only does this allow a true comparison of different firmware versions but also allows a real-life comparison of how different lenses perform under different lighting conditions. Video clips without a comparison video are initially OK but are useless for fine tuning.
It's all too easy to bash other manufacturers, but fact is, despite all shortcomings, their products exist. The Mobius 2 (M2) has also been available for quite some time, but it's not yet on the market. There are still a very few teething problems that need to be fixed, maybe too much perfection, who knows?
If I were the manufacturer, I would most probably do the same. I would not release immature firmware or unstable hardware only to be the first on the market. Others may think differently. No product is perfect when it's first released, and the M2 won't be an exception. It's a question of how many bugs, inconveniences, hardware design flaws, etc. will be accepted by the majority. Personally, I hate buggy software/firmware when I pay for something I expect to work properly.
With regard to the competition, if parameters still can't be reliably set after a product has been on the market for 5 months then something is very seriously wrong - IMO (In My Opinion)![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)
It's all too easy to bash other manufacturers, but fact is, despite all shortcomings, their products exist. The Mobius 2 (M2) has also been available for quite some time, but it's not yet on the market. There are still a very few teething problems that need to be fixed, maybe too much perfection, who knows?
If I were the manufacturer, I would most probably do the same. I would not release immature firmware or unstable hardware only to be the first on the market. Others may think differently. No product is perfect when it's first released, and the M2 won't be an exception. It's a question of how many bugs, inconveniences, hardware design flaws, etc. will be accepted by the majority. Personally, I hate buggy software/firmware when I pay for something I expect to work properly.
With regard to the competition, if parameters still can't be reliably set after a product has been on the market for 5 months then something is very seriously wrong - IMO (In My Opinion)
![Wink ;) ;)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png)