Or do you try to suggest that it's a bad advertising of reseller made by mistake (bad copy-paste from another product)? I don't get it...
Bad copy paste from another product made by the seller. That bad copy paste was also on Amazon, they removed it after people reported the problem.
Do you have the 1CH version or the 2CH version? You posted a screenshot from the camera with 2CH and not the camera with 1CH. If you have 1CH but posted the screenshot from 2CH means you searched for mistakes, just to hate something.
On the first review made for A129 Plus on Youtube, before it was launched, I offered the information that the secondary channel have its own chipset and my question was how Viofo will offer buffered parking mode if two chipsets are encoding the videos? So the answer at your question can be that the A129 Plus rear camera have its own video chipset and the main buffer cannot be shared for two chipsets. In theory each camera should have two internal memory for each chipset so it can use its own buffer. The camera buffer is limited. It is used also for processing the image quality, so more processing for the image means less free buffer.
But the idea is that Viofo was not advertising A129 Plus to have buffered parking mode and also not to have some Night Vision you imagine, something like the camera will record in complete dark.
The difference between that little gadget (30 euros) and A129+ single (125 euros) - under a quarter of Viofo's price, or 95euros difference - is very "relevant" for what you compare. Also, there are ~7 years between them. At its time, that gadget was very good. It has AR0330 + NT96650, like my old LS650W
Always Omnivision was better than Aptina, you could buy a dashcam with OV4689 to have better image. AR0330 is not a standard of a good image, it was used in many dashcams because it was cheap. Also 7 years ago you could buy Korean dashcams with 125 euros or more which offered better quality than any chinese dashcam, but you prefer to spent only 30 and I saw no complaints about it from you even it was a poor and very ugly dashcam. Now you have one of the best dashcams from the market and almost of your posts are just hate against a camera you own. You had 14 days free return, why not returned it if it is so bad?
I'm very glad to hear that your products play fair and, who knows, maybe I'll buy one in future.
For sure jokiin will be not happy to buy one of his products because your hate will go against his brand and is better for him you to keep the Viofo. Hating just one brand is good for everybody, your hate will be only in one dashcamtalk area.
- why to put buffered parking mode in menu/firmware if it won't work?
Dude, you are completely wrong about this.
AutoEvent Detection does not means it is Buffered parking mode. Why are you false assume that detecting a motion it should be based on a buffer? Do you know how it is working the AutoEvent Detection? Is is just based on motion detection. Motion = record. No motion = stand by.
Nothing about buffer.