Wow, if anyone ever wondered where the phrase "pot calling the kettle black" cane from... Now you know.
As has already been stated numerous times in this thread (probably even on page one)... No, there are no cameras specifically made for recording what's happening on the sides of your car. But there are plenty of cameras that will do the job just fine.
Which is precisely what I told the OP. So, if there is a definition of drivel, you just refined it with your nearly 8,000th post.
Another DCT Law Enforcement Official, no doubt. You will find this psychopathy on many forums throughout the internet. It is a well know fact on the internet.
Using your logic, the GoPro line of cameras should not exist.
That's logical fallacy and a non-sequitur reply on the merits. It has absolutely zero logically follow-up to anything I've posted inside this thread. None. If you can show a logical nexus between your statement here and anything I've written in this thread, I'll eat my hat. You won't - so I won't.
They were not specifically designed for almost ANY of the various ways people use them, yet they do exceptionally well in those uses.
The GoPro was not designed for taking Action Footage? What was it designed for - professional wedding photography!
You DCT Police types are monumental in the level of illogical drivel you post. Action Camera means action. It means almost any darn thing that contains physical movement. I mount several GoPro Action Cameras in my aircraft and they work well for that purpose - except they don't do very well at night in low light conditions.
It is an Action Cam, for crying out loud. What do you mean, that's not what GoPro had in mind when they designed it. GoPro headquarters is right in my backyard in San Mateo. You won't find a singular GoPro Developer or Engineer to tell you that they did not design their product to be used as an Action Cam.
Unreal.
For example - Drones didn't even exist when the first GoPro cameras were released and yet they are extremely popular among drone pilots.
Drones produce the action that Action Cameras thrive on. Do you realize how irrational you read? The "Action" is not platform dependent and GoPro did not exclude future "action platforms" from its initial design intent.
But by your logic, you shouldn't use a GoPro on a drone because that's not what they had in mind when they designed the GoPro.
GoPro designed their cameras to be used as Action Cams. The platform which delivers the action is moot. Blackvue did not design their camera to be Side Mounted. Then video framing rotates 90-dgrees and does not have
Variable 360-Dgreee Rotational Framing which is exactly
one (1) of the several functional design criteria that would be a necessity for Side Mounting of Car Cameras given the variable nature of mounting surface across a wide range of vehicle types. Ergo, it was NOT designed to be side mounted.
Creativity and adaptation are what often makes a product successful.
Another non-sequitur as the OP never asked about how you creatively adapt the side mounting of a car cam. The OP asked whether or not car cams were designed (implied) to be side mounted.
Just because it isn't specifically stated in the owner's manual doesn't mean it can't be used a certain way.
Which seals the deal on the fact it was not designed originally to be side mounted and also confirms precisely what my post concludes, as I provided the OP with videos from others who have made such adaptations with their vehicles.
I'm pretty sure the person who invented the hair dryer never imagined that someone would use it to remove a bumper sticker!
Again, more moot non-sequitur drivel as no one ever claimed that the hair dryer should be used to remove a bumper sticker.
Please, folks. Let's stay on topic. This thread has plenty of useful info, including creative ways to mount cameras for the use case given in the title. We don't want the thread to be locked or deleted because of pedantry.
There is a stark difference between being smart and trying to be a smart ass.
When you offer non-sequitur reply (redundantly and without knowing it) while assuming facts not in evidence and at the very same time repeat that which you claim to be debunking as an example of that which you think is logical, you have just pulled down your own pants and shown your own rear end.
Some of you need a disclaimer below your signature line that reads:
Warning! Post count may not reflect level of rational thought given to anything I say on this forum. Reader Beware!